Monday, March 30, 2009

Fresh From The Archives of History: Michael Lucas vs. David Forest and the Grabbys

Here's an old JUB blog post from 2007, about an even older awards show incident from 2003.

So, why am I reposting this old news about old news here? Weeeeeell, because you never know! Like this post from the past about the past says, it always good to keep the past in mind "...JUST IN CASE it becomes relevant again in the near future.":

Now I realize that this is actually really old news, but with Michael Lucas, you never know when old feuds will again rear their ugly heads (i.e., Raging Stallion Studios), and since I have only been writing the Newswire for a few months, I figured it would be OK to re-tell this story JUST IN CASE it becomes relevant again in the near future.

Picture it. Chicago. 2003. Gay porn agent David Forest is given the Grabby Award (which are kinda like the Golden Globes to the GAYVN’s Oscars of gay porn) for Best Non-Sex Role for the film Brad’s Buddies. Good old Michael Lucas, who was presenting an award right afterward, took the opportunity to express his disdain for Forest. He said from the stage,

“It’s very sad for me that we are putting ourselves, once again, so low in society by giving an award and supporting such a scum-bag as David Forest who, for years, has taken advantage and destroyed people with drugs…This industry will never gain any respect unless we will stop promoting this evil pimp, and those of you who are booing me should be ashamed of yourselves, because there’s not one word that I’ve said that isn’t true, and you know it.”
He exited the stage and was the talk of the (then-burgeoning) blogs for the next 4 days. David Forest had a rebuttal, Michael had a clarification, every columnist weighed in with their 2 cents. The general consensus within the industry was that whether or not you agreed with Michael Lucas (and there were plenty on both sides) all agreed that it was an inappropriate venue to air those opinions. In fact, Michael Lucas has pretty much been persona non grata at the Grabbys ever since. In fact, this year, after Michael Lucas’ La Dolce Vita swept the GAYVN awards, it was completely shut out at the Grabbys, not receiving a single nod. Michael claims that they are still holding a grudge from 2003, they claimed that they did not receive his screener in time to be eligible for consideration (and two of his other films did get nominations).

That’s pretty much it for that saga (it boiled over in no time at all), but another thing (which ties this story into the Johnny Hanson post) is that, after Michael Lucas left the stage, Matt Sizemore announced that he had just shot a bareback video. I think the poor BAFFLED (see I am using that word already) crowd didn’t quite know who to react more to. I hope you enjoyed this little trip into the recent history of gay porn. Hopefully we won’t need to revisit it again.
Yeah, hopefully not! :-)

Update: I must be in a nostalgic mood today, because for some reason this scene from Stanley Kubrick's 1975 classic Barry Lyndon popped into mind as well.

For those not familiar with this 18th century period piece, here's a brief recap of the scene: An arrogant puffy-lipped European aristocratic snob (Lord Bullingdon) has a long-simmering jealousy feud with the social-climbing hero of the film (Barry Lyndon). In order to tear down his "low bred" rival, Bullingdon bum rushes a stage, interrupting a recital to publicly denounce Barry as an "insolent Irish upstart" to a shocked audience:



BTW, Bullingdon then went on to use that carefully-baited and well-deserved thrashing at the end, exploiting the incident to generate a public relations pity storm in his favor.

Yep. It's funny how often life imitates art!

Update 2: An interesting chart:


Update 3: Lucas acknowledges he tried to hire Brent back in 2006, and that emails to that effect are in existence:

"To those who are saying I am going after Corrigan because he declined to be in my movie, how can that make any sense? In 11 years of business, there were many models which my company turned away and there were many models who turned down working for my company. Today we looked through all of our casting records, and found an email dating back to September 15, 2006, between our previous casting director and Brent Corrigan. At this point we, regrettably, did not know about his past and we are forever thankful that things did not work out and we declined working with him. My conscience would have never been cleared and a heavy deal of personal guilt would have shadowed me and my career."
That a "casting director" at a porn studio, former or otherwise, would have been unaware of Brent's celebrated past in September of 2006 (just when Velvet Mafia was released!) frankly strains credulity. Is Michael Lucas lying? Or are all employees of Lucas Entertainment this incompetent?

Update 4: A so-sick-he-could-vomit Jason Secrest takes Lucas out to the woodshed for misquoting him, poaching comments for his press releases, and publishing private phone numbers without permission.

Update 5: The editor at Queerty, who described the controversy as:

"The war between porn stars Michael Lucas and Brent Corrigan — or rather, Michael Lucas and the rest of the porn industry who loves Corrigan..."
...is getting sick of the Lucas Entertainment spin machine as well.

Update 6:The GorgeousBoys Online Entertainment Network disassociates with Lucas:

"Therefore, in light of my belief that “what’s good for the goose is good for the gander” my Network is now removing all of the affiliations and promotions to Lucas Entertainment’s websites and products."
Free speech, gotta love it!

Update 7: Breaking News! A Chinchilla Exclusive!

We've just received via our secret tip line a yet-unpublished but soon-to-be released on LucasBlog photo of Michael Lucas, taken right after the afterparty altercation. Obviously, it's authenticity is beyond question:


Update 8: Well, now that Michael Lucas outed Brent's new boyfriend's full real name in his latest press release, the obligatory tracking down and posting of a MySpace profile is sure to follow...and it might as well occur here, I suppose.

His full name is Eric Paul Martinez, age 31. Hmmm, and he's a father (of a six year old son). No indications of any anger issues here; although, looking at his physique, I can well imagine how just about anything he could say, from "Hello, how are you" to "Stop stepping on my feet, Mr. Lucas," could easily be misconstrued as threatening...


Update 9: Michael Lucas threatens the entire industry by knowingly and willfully violating 2257 requirements (hat tip: Elm).

Update 10: Michael Lucas - A liar AND a hypocrite. Lucas was well aware of the underage controversy as early as 2005, contradicting his own press statement claiming to be unaware when negociating to hire Brent in September of 2006 (see Update 3 above) (hat tip: Brynawel).

Update 11: Brent fills in the details on those September 2006 negociations:

""The assistant told me that Lucas didn’t write his own messages because he didn’t have a firm enough grasp of the English language, and that he had other people relay information for him. I thought this was pretty strange, you know, for one of his assistants to be telling me this, but negotiations continued.”
Update 12: J.C. Adams has an excellent, well-researched article up on the whole affaire here. Note the official statement by Joan Irvine of the Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection (ASACP.org): "Brent is now over 18 and has the right to engage in whatever legal business he chooses."

Update 13: Lucas called Village Voice columnist Michael Musto during the GAYVN's to brag:

"Remember Brent Corrigan, who forged his birth certificate and lied about being of legal age? He did porn videos when he was 17 and basically sent the owner of the company to jail. Well, I've been trying to stop him from being in porn ever since. Tonight, he was supposed to present the first award at the GayVN's. But I talked to the producers of the event and made sure he didn't. He was just canned."
But of course, the notion he was doing this for publicity is completely absurd (hat tip: Yves).

Update 14: Mark Adams interviews Brent. Most interesting quote:

"One of the things that studios, and that includes Michael Lucas, tend to ignore is the fact that the producer knew exactly how old I was, and he exploited the situation. He was smart enough to make it appear like I alone forged my documents. I was told by my boyfriend at the time and by the producer that it wasn’t a big deal, and it happened all the time. The big mistake I made was not listening to that voice inside me that said, “You should hold off.”"
Update 15: Unzipped (which will soon feature Brent on the cover of Freshmen) tells Michael Lucas to go fuck himself, after he calls to complain about the upcoming cover. A permanent link to Unzipped the Blog has been added to the right.

Update 16: And now this post has come full circle...an open letter to the GAYVNs from David Forest, in which he calls for Michael Lucas to "not be allowed to attend" future award shows:

"(Posted 4/1/2009 10:00:00 PM)
Letter to AVN's "Gay Editor" (Harker Jones) and "Owner" (Paul Fishbein)

Harker & Paul –

Congrats on the big success at last night’s GAYVN AWARDS. Sorry I wasn’t there this year … however … I would have been very upset, now that I’ve heard the reports about Michael Lucas … and how, again (he did it at the Grabby’s a few years ago) … this guy interrupted YOUR show with his highly illegal “bum rush” of your stage … the same exact stage that YOU used, a few minutes later, for his induction into your GAYVN Hall of Fame. Funny how you refuse to allow talent handlers into that elite “Hall” … but … you DO allow BUMS.

You know why it’s called a “bum rush,” right … because only a BUM would rush a stage. If a “bum” were to have done that, last night (actually, a BUM DID DO THAT) … he’d currently be sitting in the SF jail. Why you folks, involved in adult industry functions, allowed Lucas to continue coming to your events, after his Chicago “bum rush” at the Grabby’s … is puzzling. You should have known that a BUM, who already showed his true colors, was surely going to do it, again … especially when he felt “bummed” about his LACK of awards (coincidentally, the ONLY award that Lucas Ent won, last night, was for NON-SEXUAL PERFORMANCE … which Lady Bunny actually won).

Michael Lucas has NO regard for anyone, any show, any event. Since he was basically a loser, last night (believe me, he’s a HUGE LOSER now) .. not winning any awards except for his “Hall of Fame” induction and the “non-sexual perf” one, above …. he decided he’d make sure he was “remembered” … and just FORCE his way on stage to do something “loud.” That’s just what happened back in Chicago … when he did his “DAVID FOREST tirade” … unexpectedly … and without permission.

Between the Grabbys and, now, the GayVN’s … Lucas has shown his total disregard for rules, proper etiquette, scheduling, etc. … and should not be allowed to attend the events. As gracious as the guy CAN BE … he’s also a total “animal” … and cannot be trusted to behave.

I can’t believe that you let him get Corrigan bounced as a presenter … then … he goes and “steals” the microphone … since Brent’s name wasn’t properly pulled from the cue cards … and Brent got to present, anyway. Lucas didn’t fully get “his way” … so … he wanted to make sure everyone knew his feelings (about Corrigan’s movies that he did while underage). Actually, the XXX biz should never have let Corrigan continue in the biz … after his fraudulent misrepresentation of his age. BUT … he wasn’t banned … so you just gotta move on. For Lucas to decide, years later .. that it was up to him to CALL ATTENTION to Brent’s wrong doing …. and to do it the way Lucas did (like an animal) … is so wrong. Lucas just couldn’t let last night go on without making sure that HE was “remembered.” With no awards to be remembered for … he decided to create his own attention … even if it meant disrupting your show.

Lucas cannot be trusted at a public event … evidenced by his improper behavior, now, at both a GRABBYS and a GAYVN awards. The fact that Brent’s b.f. decided to show Lucas how wrong he was …. is just the KARMA coming out.

Michael Lucas AND Brent Corrigan have both been given “chances” that should never have been given. They’ve both caused major disruptions to the adult business, big events … acted in ways that are inexcusable (maybe illegal) … but … weren’t reprimanded, scolded or had sanctions placed upon them.

It’s time for the gay adult world … especially the folks who produce the big industry events, etc. … to wake up and smell the obvious. Michael Lucas will always make sure that he is a HIT at these events … even if he has to make a fool of himself. He’s a firm believer that, “all publicity is good publicity.” Can you imagine if an actor/producer/director were to ever do what Lucas has done … at the Oscar’s or the Golden Globes? You let him trash your event, last night. I’m sure you won’t let it happen again. Lucas has “scored” at both big awards shows, now. AND, to think … the guy was still inducted into your HALL OF FAME … event AFTER what he did earlier in the evening. It all makes no sense.

DAVID FOREST"

53 comments:

Anonymous said...

Michael Lucas is a nutcase!!

elmysterio said...

Vj and Jim there is no doubt about that. I personally think that this is being all blown out of proportion and I really can't weait for it to just go away.

jim said...

If 2003 was a guide, this should all blow over in four days.

BTW is anyone else not seeing the main "X Comments" link to this post? I'm not; it seems to be some odd Blogger glitch...

There is a work around by clicking on the post, which is how I'm commenting right now.

Jody said...

I'll take "Michael Lucas is a wanker, and not in the fun way" for $100, Alex.

DeWayne In San Diego said...

I really cannot think of ANYONE who has placed Gay Porn in more public jeopardy and disrepute than Michael Lucas.

I just hope Canadian Authority's charge him for Public Obscenity as has been rumored.

His Farts movie is certainly the Artistic Highlight of Michael's Career post DiMarco!

will g said...

That was really interesting to read that old JOB blog. Now I know what this post by David Forest on ATKOL was all about:

(Posted 3/29/2009 4:57:00 PM)

WHO REALLY CARES, any longer, about another Michael Lucas outburst at a major event? He is a loud-mouthed attention getter. It began 7 years ago at the Grabby Awards in Chicago. Jason Sechrest had just accepted (for me) the BEST NON-SEXUAL PERFORMANCE Award … and … Lucas then ruined the entire evening with his ranting and raving about DAVID FOREST.

Writers need to ignore Lucas. He’s a very sore loser … not winning more than a few morsels at any awards shows in years.

DAVID FOREST

elmysterio said...

First of all this is not about Brent. This is about Brent's boyfriend Marco amd Michael Lucas. Brent was the catalyst but he did no wrong in this. Michael was the one who took inappropriate action on the stage at the Gayvn's

Michael never said that Brent attacked or threatened him he said that Marco did. Whether any of it is true or not is the real issue.

Both Michael and Brent are mired in contoversy and it Seems that Marco is rapidly climbing up that ladder as well. There have been incidents reported about Marco on the blogs and some of them make it sound as if he has issues.

I can truly understand Brent's point that this should not be antoher Juicy Goo. Brent is finally getting his shit together after 4 long hard ugly years.

He finally gets some recognition from the gay porn industry and this falls in his lap. Brent as far as I can see did not ask for this. It was thrust upon him and now he has to deal with the fallout of someone elses stupid actions.

I say to everyone let this shit die an ugly death just like its birth. It really is no ones business but those directly involved and I think we should all leave it at that...

jim said...

Brent identifies him as "Paul" in his latest blog post. And I've seen the other blog posts on him too. Independant of whether this Lucas thing is true or not, getting on Paul's bad side seems like not a good idea.

And I can't help but see the pattern everyone else sees here as well. Observe:

1) Chris Henriquez
2) Bryan Kocis
3) Grant Roy
4) Paul

The funny thing to me is, the least psychotic one of this quartet appears to be Grant.

All have reputations as possessive hotheads to one degree or another. But Grant's the the only one who ever let go, and broke up with Brent on amicable terms. Even after this Paul guy supposedly hit him with a car and broke his arm.

Question to ponder: Does Brent pick them for this quality? Or does being with Brent cause one to become like this?

Remember my Helen of Troy analogy Elm?

Grant said...

Paul conducted himself as a gentleman and with restraint as far as I'm concerned. As Lucas made his initial unwelcome comments on stage both he and I jumped up and gave serious thought of heading to the stage to confront this press hungry egotistical idiot!

Instead, along with the majority of the crowd in attendance we just booed and jeered him off the stage. Luckily he was seated on the other side of the auditorium, otherwise self-restraint for me would have been much more difficult if he'd passed by me on the way back to his seat! And I was sitting on the isle too!

Then at the Nakedsword After-party, Brent, Paul and myself were enjoying some drinks with friends fans and new acquaintances in the VIP area celebrating our accomplishments of the evening, when Mr. Lucas (along with camera crew in toe) kept trying to push his way into our space in an effort to start some trouble. We just for the most part ignored him, except for to shout a few well deserved expletives in his direction! There were NEVER any death threats. Maybe a good ass whipping or two was in order, but nothing more. If I was in the mood at the time? It would have definitely been worth a night or two in jail to carry out a good ole fashioned ass whipping on that ugly (beauty is only skin deep Mr.Lucas, underneath your sniped, shaped and stretched exterior lies an extremely repulsive, arrogant and obviously miserable individual. Did I mention; bitter, jealous, envious and shallow?) son of a bitch's ass!

Paul reported the attempted harassment to the club security who pulled Mr. Lucas to the back and warned him if it were to continue they would have no choice but to remove him. Then after the party breaks and everyone heads to their rooms for the evening peacefully without incident. Mr. Lucas contacts the SF Police providing a completely false accusation, which prompted the police to show up at Brent and Paul's room and awaken them for questioning on the matter. They were both questioned at the hotel. Once their story was told they were both released to return back to their room.

My only response in all this is; Mr. Lucas, Mr. Rocker and Mr. Ridge, Keep talking because we'll just keep laughing about it all the way to the bank!

One word of advice to Mr. Lucas and others I've mentioned like him; Don't fuck with us! Those who have tried have failed miserably and you are no exception!

Sincerely,

Grant

jim said...

"Then at the Nakedsword After-party, Brent, Paul and myself were enjoying some drinks with friends fans and new acquaintances in the VIP area celebrating our accomplishments of the evening, when Mr. Lucas (along with camera crew in toe) kept trying to push his way into our space in an effort to start some trouble."

There was a camera crew with ML?

Were they filming this by chance? I assume the answer is yes, otherwise, what would be the point of a camera crew in tow?

This is an important detail. I'm a bit surprised it hasn't been mentioned until now...

jim said...

Hmmm, The Sword now has a "timeline" up, which raises more questions than it answers.

Specifically, they omit any mention of Brent being pulled as a presenter at ML's demand, and the decisions BY THEM that took place that night as result.

Also, a photo of Paul is there too.

will g said...

'Mason Wyler's Final Word About Being Raped"

jim said...

We can only hope!

Geoff Harvard said...

"this Paul guy supposedly hit him with a car and broke his arm."

Grant, at any time, did "Paul" strike you with a motor vehicle and cause your arm to be broken? What could possibly be the context surrounding this incident?

Anonymous said...

Late answer to your question Jim,
this morning the comments "thing" was not there- that has happened several times.
It comes back when the page is refreshed a few times.

elmysterio said...

Jim that thing about Marco Paul hitting Grant with a car is a serious accusation. I would be very careful about making such statements.

Something like that can get you a lawyer letter. Uno who will soon be claiming that he has a video tape of the actual incident and that he was the first to report it.

jim said...

Well, I did say "supposedly."

Jody said...

Question to ponder: Does Brent pick them for this quality? Or does being with Brent cause one to become like this?

Former shrink and social worker here who's worked with plenty of battered folk.

If someone has a problem controlling the expression of their anger -they- have the problem. They're responsible. No one makes them that way.

From personal friendship, Brent is no more exasperating and difficult than any other 22 year-old, popular press to the contrary.

brynawel said...

It looks as if ML's PR stunt backfires heavily.
And it may be that parts of "the industry" agree with him, even applaud him. But the tenor amongst his potential customers is largly anti-ML. And now he even pissed of publishers. Could it get any worse? Oh, yes! I am looking forward to read those emails regarding LDV.

will g said...

Re Update 7:

The folds in the pillow -- or are they surgical napkins? -- look suspiciously familiar. Otherwise, it looks legit. Michael was the victim of a vicious assault, how DARE you attack the victim??

jim said...

I was going to post some police reports I made...er, found, but ran out of time...

brynawel said...

"[...] September 15, 2006 [...] At this point we, regrettably, did not know about his past [...]"

Where did I read similar bullshit before?

jim said...

Could it have been...Harlow's blog? :-)

brynawel said...

Oh, yes. There.
Those Gay Porn Companies, unaware of the ongoings in their industry, must be an east cost phenomenon.

will g said...

Update 9

(Just helping you out Jim.)

jim said...

"Jones took the concern to Darren Roberts, CEO of GAYVN publisher AVN Media Network. Because AVN's policy has been to protect the industry from people who have hurt companies and the adult industry's reputation in the past, Roberts told Jones to remove Corrigan from the presenters list."

Yet in 2008, they had no nominating AND awarding Nikolay Petrov, who was found guilty of braining an elderly couple nearly to death with a hammer.

But then again, Michael Lucas never had a problem with Petrov.

brynawel said...

Michael Lucas has been on a campaign against under-aged models for years, since at least 2005, when the Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection warned the gay adult industry that Corrigan admitted he forged his identification just before his 17th birthday and worked for Cobra Video before he was of a legal age.

... but did not know about Brent Corrigans past in September 2006.

jim said...

OMG Bryn, good catch!

What a fucking hypocrite he is. He knew about Brent being underage in 2005, yet in 2006, he tries to hire him.

elmysterio said...

You do realize that from an astrological point of view Brent and Paul are doomed. Sorpios and geminies are explosive together.

Anyone around them can get hurt by the fall out. so I say to everyone commenting about this matter should be wary of falling objects.

will g said...

Stop attacking the victim!

elmysterio said...

I stand by my coment that Michael lucas recieved a bad batch of botox and some cologen from a psychotic wet nurse. This would explains his recent irrational behaviour.

The slured speach and the stumbleing into people at gay porn events was recently spoken of in a CDC report on black market beauty aids.

Michael Lucas can not be held responsible for his recent actions. he is under the influence of black market botox.

elmysterio said...

will I am not attacking the victim I am simply explaining the astrological theory of the compatibility of their signs. Will there are plenty of websites that will confirm my statement.

http://www.astrology.com/allaboutyou/loveconnection/

brynawel said...

Astrology? Really?
I just made myself a cup of tea. Interested in some tea leaves?

will g said...

Elm, that actually wasn't directed at you, your comment hadn't posted yet. It was meant for Jim, who called Michael a "fucking hypocrite," which is just uncalled for after the poor dear suffered such a brutal attack. He got "bumped into" and wound up in the hospital (see Update 7.)

DeWayne In San Diego said...

Now Now Elm I was in a relationship for 6 years with a Gemini, I am a Taurus we were not supposed to be compatablie!

We were crazy of course!

Gemini's and Scorpios are a wicked combo I agree ;)

I do agree Elm I have been talking to plenty of people who were at GayVN Michael Lucas was slurring and stumbling from the start.

Best guess from people in the know?

Lucas is known to mix his Valium and Vodka..

We all know what that combination can do!

My suggestion

Michael Drink Up and swallow some more,,,Sweet Dreams Baby!

elmysterio said...

1) No Brynwal I don't need the tea leaves I am clarevoyant,

2) Will sorry I did not know that comment was directed ast Jim. Jim you are such a meany.

3) Dewayne it is a case of mad cow brought on by tainted botox you can read about it here http://elmysterio.blogspot.com/2009/03/lucas-to-get-secret-treatment-outside.html

4)Jim don't tell me I never gave you anything
http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS237864+15-May-2008+PRN20080515
enjoy the read.

Lana11 said...

@Brynawel
Elsewhere I posted
“There is an amazing scene in Lucas’ rip off of Fellini’s classic “La dolce Vita”. A friend who we just saw having sex with a very young looking man in a pink shirt approaches our hero, the cynical society reporter played by ML in desperation as he has been accused of “sex with a minor”. He asks for help. Lucas just mumbles if the boy is the one with the pink shirt and his friend answers, no, he is 19. Then Lucas just walks off coldly.
I hear that Lucas wanted to have BC for that film (and probably that part); so his claim that he never even talked to him might be not quite true.”
So if it is correct that Lucas or someone in his company had been kinky enough to cast Brent not just for any part, but for a part associated with underage issues (but finally identified as 19) you would be more than right regarding the incorrect nature of ML’s statement.

I do not know any of the involved characters personally; clearly my sympathy is directed towards Brent. However, to me Lucas seems somewhat of a narcissistic decadent in the classical European sense, obviously blasé and arrogant. That however would not be enough for me to harshly criticize him, surely not his piss fetish (why not) and not even his intervention in a porn award show (it’s a bit odd to demand good behaviour at such an occasion). What I do reject though is the self rigorous, hypocritical and pseudo-moralistic statement in his press release that he even spiced up with a vengeance; that and his perfidious move to involve the police instead of settling his affairs of honour himself as a good European decadent should do. That indeed would have been “cavalier”. So obviously the very mixture of his pseudo-aristocratic Russian demeanour and his act as the good, caring, law abiding, law enforcement seeking business man becomes toxic, a cultural botox so to speak.

jim said...

Good link Elm! Lucas is ENDANGERING THE ENTIRE INDUSTRY:

"Lucas appears to also have knowingly and willfully violated 18 U.S.C. Section 2257... Spunk is informing distributors/retailers/streamers who may be considered secondary producers under the law that they may wish to note that the labeling on Michael Lucas' movie "Raw Twinks in Czech" is defective, and that this could be a violation
of Federal law."

will g said...

Yes, the ML "bareback" controversy was covered by JC Adams here. I don't believe Lucas ever even admitted that he was releasing that video, even though he clearly was planning to. I actually looked for it I couldn't find it anywhere, even in the largest video stores. So I think once the lawsuit was filed and the controversy erupted, he may have backed off and never released it.

Anonymous said...

Will you might want to do a little research on Lucas in the dirty south. Seems to be a shortage of condoms on his movie sets

Jody said...

>I don't believe Lucas ever even admitted that he was releasing that video

I think the point must be made that Mr. Lucas also -produced- the movie and then, it seems, went to great lengths to hide his involvement (using another production company to do the work.)

He really is a tool.

Anonymous said...

"Remember Brent Corrigan, who forged his birth certificate and lied about being of legal age? He did porn videos when he was 17 and basically sent the owner of the company to jail. Well, I've been trying to stop him from being in porn ever since. Tonight, he was supposed to present the first award at the GayVN's. But I talked to the producers of the event and made sure he didn't. He was just canned."

This is the problem with people who are reactionary, they never think before they blurt out stupid shit.

Michael is wrong when he says that Brent sent Bryan to jail. Bryan sent himself to jail for fucking a 15 year old boy who he met on the internet in 2001 and video taping the evidence for the police.

It would appear that Micheal has his cases mixed up. Bryan was arrested before Cobra Video was formed. Brent did not work for Bryan until 2004.

As it would seem Bryan did not learn his lesson or as many believe he did not care. As I have said on many occasions Bryan is just as much at fault in this as Brent is.

Bryan did not do his job in verifying the id of the model. A photo copy of one ID is not sufficient ID for a porn movie.

jim said...

Yeah I'm glad you noticed that too, because it bears noticing: ML does not even know the basics of the Brent Corrigan saga.

All he knows, apparantly, is Brent went to work while 17. He does not know OR CARE about any other detail. Such as, no official action was EVER taken against Bryan Kocis for knowingly producing and distributing underage porn.

Yes, KNOWINGLY. Bryan, as you all may recall, was privately tipped off as to Brent's true age just after EPD was completed. That's when the cover-up began.

And as they say, it's not the crime that does the damage, it's the cover-up.

Anyways, back to the point...ML does not know or even CARE about the facts. And that's because, he's not doing this out of some airy principle. No, he's doing this for:

1) revenge (for the La Dolce Vita rejection); and

2) publicity.

elmysterio said...

I don't want to toot my own horn but I will anyway. Check out my latest blog post. I think it makes some good sense when it comes to this ML/BC mess.

Http://elmysterio.blogspot.com

jim said...

Yes I read it already, it's very good.

elmysterio said...

why thank you jim

Kevin said...

Who is Michael Lucas?

jim said...

Interesting thing about Update 16...this is the first call for a awards show ban on Michael Lucas as punishment for his recent antics that I am aware of.

Jody said...

Have we heard from Andy Rooney yet?

"You know what pisses me off? Porn wars...."

jim said...

LOL!

jim said...

Well, this is Thursday, and if history is a guide, the last day of this online kerfuffle (The 2003 David Forest award show incident got blogged for four days).

Unless something new to this magically appears (ie, Michael Lucas getting indicted by the SF DA for filing a false police report) my guess is, you'll all now see this story die down rapidly from here on out.

DeWayne In San Diego said...

kerfuffle: A commotion or fuss.

hmm I learned a new word (for me) I have read and heard it being used never bothered to check it out.

http://www.worldwidewords.org/weirdwords/ww-ker1.htm

Rob said...

Yawn!

Michael Lucas' numerous PR statements and updates on "the Gayvn Incident", with Mea culpas from Jason Sechrest, mushed up and tossed into File 13, where that steamy mess of crap appropriately belongs.