Saturday, January 24, 2009

Two Years Ago Today...

...Harlow Cuadra showed up for his scheduled meeting at Bryan Kocis' house, smelled smoke, looked in the open door, saw a body, heard footsteps upstairs, and then ran away.

Kidding!

You know, it's interesting; on one hand we know a lot of crucial details about what Harlow and Joe did two years ago today. We know from the affidavit "Danny" aka Harlow kept emailing and talking to Bryan today, firming up plans for the meeting (finally set at between 7 and 8 pm that evening, "depending on traffic"). We know that Joe too was busy on the computer that day, dealing with website, sales and other adminstrative matters. We know from the Black's Beach Tapes that Harlow and Joe reconned the house in advance of the meeting, specifically checking the front door for peepholes. We know they went shopping at the local Walmart shortly before the murder, buying "lighter fluid, a knife, KY jelly, and condoms."

We know Harlow must have arrived at the house at 60 Midland Drive shortly before Bryan's long conference call ended (according to phone records) at 7:50 pm. In fact, here's a new "musing:"...I actually believe now that Harlow arrived MUCH sooner - 7:30, perhaps as early as 7:00 pm, even. Why? Because as Harlow indicated at Black's Beach, he listened to an extensive portion of this conference call, in which Bryan, Bryan's attorney Sean Macias, and LSG partner Lee Bergeron were all actively conspiring to "send [Grant] packing" "to Texas." As incredible as it sounds, this "backdoor deal" conversation has to be true; you can see my full reasoning on the subject here, but in a nutshell Harlow knew too many details about a condo offered to Brent, plus of the legal issues and attornies involved, for Harlow's detailed account of this conference call to have been fabricated.

If we assume now that Harlow arrived between 7 and 7:30 pm, and was forced to listen to Bryan yammering away on his Blackberry for at least 20 minutes plotting Grant's exile and Brent's condo captivity, that would have given Harlow that much more time perhaps to case the joint...peering into the office where Kocis kept the video cameras and proprietary records, pehaps...locating visually the position of all the smoke detectors...etc. Then, at 7:50 pm, Bryan finally tires of this long conference call (it actually began at 5:35 pm!) and says something like '...hey guys, D(inaudible) is here; it's been fun, but gotta run, bye!'

Anyways, from 7:50pm and until 8:34 pm (when the Fire Department was dispatched)...it's interesting how on the other hand how LITTLE we actually know. The only source for what happened is what Harlow and Joe said at the Crab Catcher and at Black's Beach. And as Michael Gross observes in the Out article:

As damning as these lines appear, it’s impossible to know precisely how to read them. Strikingly, Harlow’s quoted remarks in the affidavit sound more like the statements of a man who witnessed a murder than those of a man who committed one. (Joe, it seems, was mostly interjecting details as Harlow described meeting Bryan.) Harlow’s story, as related by this document, is confusing (and perhaps intentionally presented that way by police; at the time of arrest, it is common to withhold evidence that will be introduced at trial), but other details raise the possibility that a third man might have been present when Bryan was killed. Harlow “stated that he and another ‘did some recon work’” before his meeting with Bryan. And after he arrived at Bryan’s house and they drank some wine together, Harlow said that his “ ‘dude’ ‘came around’, and ‘it was crazy.’”
In other words, we just don't know who actually stabbed Bryan. It mighta been Harlow, it mighta been Joe, it mighta been both (there were a total of two knives purchased, after all). I very much doubt there was ever a "third man" involved so, it has to be one of the three "mightas" listed above. But Harlow was present for the killing; that we know for certain. Indeed, he was instrumental in bringing it about, at the very least.

And I have to think Joe was there too in some capacity. Despite what he said when he took his plea (that he was back at the Fox Ridge Inn) cell tower info places Joe at the Kocis home, not the Inn. He may have been there only to help load the loot into the Xterra, but he was there, I am certain of it.

The upshot of all this continued deception is, we probably will NEVER know precisely what happened at 60 Midland Drive between 7:50 and about 8:30 pm. It seems Harlow and Joe pretty much hate each other these days, with both out of spite seeking to minimize their role, and enhance their partner's role, in the murder. And since neither of them have a trustworthy bone in their body, nothing they can ever say about the murder can ever really be believed. Hence this part of the murder will likely forever remain a mystery.

So, between 7:50 and about 8:30 pm, Bryan is stabbed to death by either/both of Harlow/Joe, the house is ransacked for video cameras, propietary documents, computers and a Rolex watch, then set ablaze.

Oh, and one final rather anticlimactic and comical event: As they are driving like a bat out of hell (well, Back Mountain, actually), probably passing fire engines going the other way with lights flashing and sirens blaring, Harlow or Joe (ie, whoever's not driving) gets on the laptop and at 8:35 pm emails a relatively new client, Matthew Brannon. According to the affidavit, they hit Brannon up for $4000 donation so Harlow could attend "webmaster school" at Old Dominion University (Brannon was skeptical, but eventually allowed a $1000 charge on his credit card anyways).

I think this exchange, coming at this exact time, was perhaps some kind of half-baked (and unsuccessful) attempt to establish an "email alibi." That it actually generated $1000 in revenue probably came a pleasant shock to Harlow and Joe.

After this, I presume they just hit the freeway (there is no record of them having checked out of the Fox Ridge Inn), making the eight hour drive back to Virginia Beach, which they would have reached early the next morning.

Update: You know, there is just SO much evidence against Harlow and Joe in this case that it's exceedingly easy to overlook some of it. A good example is the fact that it was not until I was working on today's post that I realized I had missed Harlow's escort appointments with Matthew Brannon on the 19th and 20th. I've made a whole new post for the 19th ("The New Client") and have edited the entry for the 20th ("The Background Check") accordingly.

Update 2: Totally off topic - the most entertaining porn clip introduction of the week!

Update 3: Moderately off topic - a shakeup in the Luzerne County judicial system, and the current presiding judge is out. The scandal involves two judges who sentenced juveniles to private boot camps that it turns out, they partially owned (and hence profitted from). As I read it, the judges will now sit down at a pow wow in the next three days to elect a new presiding judge amongst themselves...which theoretically could end up being the relatively well-regarded Judge Peter Paul Olszewski.

Update 3(a): Conohan and Ciaverella plead guilty to tax and fraud charges, will serve 87 months. No word yet on whether they've admitted to killing Bryan and framing Harlow and Joe (although if they did all this killing/framing to avoid corruption charges, it doesn't appear to have helped them much in the long run, I must say...).
Update 3(b): Al Flora is Ciaverella's attorney. Ha, just watch, next we'll find out Fannick is representing Conohan....
Update 3(c): Well, no; turns out it's someone else, another lawyer we've actually never heard of before: "Conahan’s attorney, Philip Gelso, declined comment." Frankly I'm shocked! Given how the same names keep getting repeated over the past two years, I was fairly certain we'd all had the entire bar membership of Luzerne County memorized by now. Where'd this Gelso guy been hiding?

44 comments:

will g said...

". . .(there is no record of them having checked out of the Fox Ridge Inn). . ."

Doesn't that kind of blow BOTH of their "alibis" out of the water -- they both claim they never left the motel, yet somehow they forgot to check out?

"I think this exchange, coming at this exact time, was perhaps some kind of half-baked (and unsuccessful) attempt to establish an 'email alibi.'"

Half-baked? I'll say. It's the opposite of an alibi if the e-mail is sent at almost the exact moment the fire is reported. Why would they not know that? I really do wonder if they both have some kind of learning disability. The blunders are just staggering.

Rob said...

Will G. astutely observes, "Doesn't that kind of blow BOTH of their "alibis" out of the water -- they both claim they never left the motel, yet somehow they forgot to check out?"

Precisely on target Will.

Jim--

I liked your comments regarding the Backdoor Deal. Your summation of it is chilling and meancing to its intended victims--Grant and Sean.

Three days after the murder, as I have stated previously, someone involved in that conference call, minus the dead man, posted a comment at Jason Curious' stating the exact outline of the Backdoor deal. Joe and Harlow have never been that sophisticated in writing. Additionally, Harlow would have nothing to gain by blabbing this bit of news because he would not have understood its ramifications, excepting Sean was to be turned into a sexual ATM.

I doubt Macias would have been naive enough to even hint at this depose Grant, enslave Sean scheme. I used to think that Lee Bergeron might have left the comment. I doubt that too because Bergeron likes to ambush from the shadows and keeps his cards up his sleeve. Cadinot4ver, Kocis' British lawyer friend, was a caller on the night of murder as was Robert Wagner. They seem more likely candidates.

No matter who posted that Backdoor Deal comment, it was someone with intimate knowledge of the details planned for Sean's future and Grant's demise.

I am not disappointed that nothing was said about a mid-winter's camping trip without equipment, food, water, or clothing necessary for cold weather. Golly gee whiz willackers Chinchilla Man not a hint of a whisker of fact for camping! That means that Eco-Studs, Harlow and Joe, were warming their happy asses in front of the electric fire in their room at the Fox Ridge Inn as opposed to warming those same happy asses in front of an open air, wood, campsite fire. Another myth exploded by facts.

quickysrt said...

Rob said... No matter who posted that Backdoor Deal comment, it was someone with intimate knowledge of the details planned for Sean's future and Grant's demise.
----

Never mind who posted the comment, but "why" they would post it to an internet publicist is beyond me.

Sounds like dual motives. Or lies being spread, as we have seen much of. Planting bad info as if it is all just casual chit chat.

DeWayne In San Diego said...

Quicky

It was a part of the plan to set up Grant as the guilty planner of Bryans murder.

Something Robert Wagner AND Joe Kerekes were involved in on the blogs.(The defamation)

I used to think they were in collusion but now realize it was just Roberts blind Hatred at work.

As for Joe he took Grants statement at LaCirque to heart that he would be suspect # 1 if Bryan turned up dead.Joe proceeded to spread comments all over Jasons as an Anon that Grant was involved.

Robert was just taking advantage as well since HE KNEW from the beginning Harlow Cuadra killed Bryan.

As for posting the backdoor deal?

Simply part of the smear campaign.

No wonder Robert has since moved to England!

jim said...

"No wonder Robert has since moved to England!"

And I wonder who is hosting him there?

DeWayne In San Diego said...

I would say his good friend Cad the "barrister" but his BF moved with him so who knows.

I should add Robert and his BF Ben have an "open" relationship since every time Robert visits NYC he sets his ManHunt profile to

"Available"

DeWayne In San Diego said...

Oh I wanted to add that Mason Clip was a god damned bore no wonder MOC posted it!

Funny I never heard of Cody Cummings which proves I just tune out narcissistic muscle types.

Rob said...

Jim, quoting Dewayne, said...
"No wonder Robert has since moved to England!"

And I wonder who is hosting him there?

I vote for Cadinot4ver. The barrister has a thing for loose cannons underfoot.

BB said...

if it is true RW moved to England, good luck to him, it shows he moved on with his life. that is a good thing.

as for the RW posts you all talk about, where are they? not once has anyone been able to show one (other than JG).

Dewayne mention defamation. that one really makes me laugh. look at all most have accused RW of doing :)

if any of this went to court for one person suing another for claims and statements made - the judge would tell everyone to fuck off out of his court. more importantly, it would never make it to court.

will g said...

I actually agree with BB about the likelihood of any defamation or libel lawsuit stemming from this case being unsuccessful and/or thrown out of court. The exception is when someone accuses innocent parties by name of conspiring in a murder. There, we are not talking about besmriching somebody's reputation, we are talking about somebody being accused of a capital offense, where hard evidence and witnesses can be marshaled for the plaintiff. So I wouldn't be at all be surprised if such a suit is filed at a future date by certain parties against other certain parties.

jim said...

"The exception is when someone accuses innocent parties by name of conspiring in a murder."

Yep.

Grant said...

Correct Jim! They're already on it. Once the trail at hand concludes, they'll proceed! ;)

Which is why a certain individual fled the country? To avoid civil litigation and criminal prosecution!

>Grant

jim said...

Oh dear. I MAY have to stay on and blog such a trial...

BB said...

"Oh dear. I MAY have to stay on and blog such a trial..."

me too, sounds like tons of fun and lots of laughs to be had :)

(Jim, i think u know why hehe)

alas it will never happen :(

sure would be fun to um witness :)

jim said...

Lets try to avoid direct personal attacks here, please.

DeWayne In San Diego said...

yeah BB just what Judge Ciravella no doubt was saying last week.

It will never happen..

Justice comes when you least expect it but it comes.

Keep watching for those G -men baby got your 9mm all loaded up?

You do know those are "ILLEGAL" in the UK!

BTW The US picks people up in Britain all the time you might want to consider the safe haven for all criminals of a certain bent.

Argentina you sure are familiar with La Plata!

jim said...

You know, I must say all this talk of follow-up cases is interesting, especially in view of a post I have been sitting on, awaiting publication for tomorrow.

BB said...

"yeah BB just what Judge Ciravella no doubt was saying last week."

your just guessing... again.

regardless, RW has broke no laws to my knowledge. people fail to provide proof.

as for your fixation with guns, well... i wont flame here, but will point out it is YOUR fixation.

gun laws are VERY strict in the UK. if RW is there, I do not think he'd have a weapon with him.

as for being in the usa, if he does pack a gun, i assume he would do so legally.

"For the years 1980 through 1993, 16.2 million civilian guns were imported, and 4.6 million were exported, according to the BATF. The net for import and export, then, is about 11.6 million imported. This compares to 57.0 million production for civilian use over the same period. Hence, the net of civilian guns made available for use is about 68.6 million guns over a 14 year period, for an average of 4.9 million guns per year."

based on this, it would be no shock or surprise if RW does have a gun or two.

BB said...

"You know, I must say all this talk of follow-up cases is interesting, especially in view of a post I have been sitting on, awaiting publication for tomorrow."

there will be one i know of for sure - it does NOT involve RW.

will g said...

Well, we know of one "follow-up" case that WON'T be happening -- the post-trial arrest, trial, and conviction of Sean and Grant. How very disappointed some people are going to be, and how very much crow will have to be eaten. For that reason alone, Jim, I hope this blog doesn't vanish too quickly.

HAH! Just before I was going to hit "Publish" I see BB chimed in. I rest my case!

jim said...

Really? Involving who, and concerning what?

quickysrt said...

BB said...
if it is true RW moved to England, good luck to him, it shows he moved on with his life. that is a good thing.
----

You should take a lead from him, he might be on to something!

Rob said...

Bio Boi--

"Once the trail at hand concludes, they'll proceed! ;)", Grant writes.

Feel the love. Pass it along to Cad.

Rob said...

Jim--

That's easy. More crappola from the Biohazard Boi spin factory.

You're right. I don't give a fig for Harlequin.

He left US jurisdiction without permission. His stock in trade is attacking others as deflection from his list of faults. He's culpable on enticing a minor to cross state lines for the purposes of the sex trade, the Mann Act.
The list grows.

He wants to write. Let him. That he was as much a GHB drink lacing, raping pervert as Bryan Kocis is well established.

Geoff Harvard said...

RW is such a classic American patriot. Look at the grand way in which he celebrated Independence Day in 2004.

If he is in the UK, how do you suppose he makes a living? I hear legal immigration is difficult unless you have at least a grandparent who is a British citizen or, tragically, a British subject of a former imperial possession.

If you can't get a straight job, maybe you could arrange client appreciation meetings for a cut of the performance fee. He appears to have talent and experience for that.

Anonymous said...

Doesn't sound at all like you have taken my advice for mental help bb.

Don't say I didn't try :(

& Will is on to something there about you eating lots of crow.

ARE YOU GOING TO ADMIT that you spent an awful lot lof time accusing innocent people of murder-
Ooh- I mean "blood on their hands"
when YOU WERE WRONG the whole time-
or are you just gonna let that one slide??

Anonymous said...

geoff's right-
Damned near impossible for an American citizen to get [legal] work in the U.K.
Pain in the Royal Ass just coming in and out of the U.K. regularly as they suspect you are working and dig-

interesting -
that trip to the U.K. will not last.
Go to Holland-
Amsterdam- lots of stuff to do- right up your alley- so to speak.

DeWayne In San Diego said...

La Plata VJ
La Plata & Buenos Aries cities filled with impoverished boys selling themselves CHEAP, beautiful boys with European ethnicity.

Where else can you get fine Italian,German and English boys so cheap?

La Plata

OTB Video

Called the Latin Cobra Video for the way young "barely legal" boys even thinner than Brent Corrigan in Poolboy appear in countless DVD's filmed in the "Cobra style"

Enthusiastic Anal sex filmed with an "American sensibility"

By someone who "Studied" and "mimics" Bryan Kocis.

Or worked for him?

La Plata,Costa Rica, Istanbul,Berlin,Prague,Amsterdam,London,Rio De Janerio

What do they ALL have in common?

Frequent visits from Robert Wagner

14 trips overseas (that we know about) in 2 years since Bryans murder.(He moved to London in the fall)

Is he "conventionally employed"?

What else do the above mentioned city's have in common?

Sexual Trafficking and slavery of teen boys.

A ready supply for the cameras
and the bedroom.

Anonymous said...

"14 trips overseas in 2 years"

That is interesting-
makes sense why someone consumed with hate, spews out garbage-
all the while hiding behind his comupter-
and running-

what a life!

what a coward.

BB said...

Dewayne your too funny LOL. However, lets assume you are correct, who is the customer of such porn?

“Latin American Twinks! Bareback fucking with an intensity you rarely see in porn! I rented this video a month ago and was blown away, had to be I went back to the store and bought it”. Dewayne.

Not only did you buy it, you uploaded it via a torrent site to share with 1000's of other people. The there is twink bondage/piss s&m stuff your into.

I have the list of all movies you did this with over a two year period, as well as all your thoughts and comments in your own words.

So um yes, very funny what you say when put into perspective with your own actions.

will g said...

Yawn. DeWayne likes porn. DeWayne likes twinks. DeWayne likes kink. DeWayne likes kinky twink porn. DeWayne uploaded on a torrent site.

WE GET IT BB!!!!!

Can we please move on to something RELEVANT?

Rob said...

Biohazard Boi--

Always deflecting from his faults.

Dewayne doesn't have problems. You do.

Yep. Harlequin, the coward. Runs under aliases. You got the ears turned on.

He's brave when he can lace drinks with GHB, bind an underage kid. That leads to why any guy would want to be a stand-in for a middle-aged, probated, pervert who couldn't get it up conventionally. I delve deeper when someone tells me a guy like Harlequin is irrelevant.

will g said...

You know, BB, I really don't mean to "yell" at you or be rude. But I just noticed you have an ENTIRE POST on your blog attacking DeWayne. That is precisely where it belongs (if it belongs anywhere). Why isn't that enough for you? Why must you subject the readers of Jim's fine blog to this nonsense? What makes you think any of us are interested, or that it has any meaning for anyone but you?

DeWayne also has a published e-mail address on his sites. Use it and leave us out of it. Thank you.

will g said...

Just one more thing, then I'll shut up. Just to be fair, and I've said it a million times, but the constant chorus of "BB = RW" also seems just as irrelevant to me. It may be true, it may not. I don't think anybody has real proof, and BB denies it. This has been going on forever.

I've never really understood why Robert Wagner has any bearing on this case. He was cleared of any wrongdoing by the DA, just as Sean and Grant were, was he not? Yet it seems he gets talked about here more than Harlow and Joe sometimes. A little perspective, people!

Rob said...

Will, no disrespect to you, but do let Robert Wagner go on. You are getting a close up look at the inner workings of his mind.

A central question is why would BK's self-professed "best friend and personal assisant" want to cast aspersions on the character of Sean and Grant? Harlequin hasn't been forthcoming in open forums with where he was when King Cobra met up with Doom.

He doesn't like being reminded that he was one of the dead man's last callers. Or that his departure from Dallas Township on 21/22 January is elusive.

He's got credibility issues. Starting with counting. Odd those other Bio Boi styled "hookers'" statements do not line up with his.

I am all in favor of his going on here. Get a taste of the real Robert Wagner, the guy with aliases and Renee Martin for a whine buddy. He's so unoriginal he has to stick with BK's JG program when it is obviously not working. Mensa material. Mensa has been is more like it.

BB said...

"jim said...

Really? Involving who, and concerning what?"

not going to say, all will find out soon enough.

BB said...

Will, you hit it spot on. Anytime anyone calls me RW with the accusations that go along with it do require a direct answer from me.

As for Dewayne and his love of twinks... unlike him I can and do offer back-up to what I say in reply to his comments directed at me.

He dares rant and say all those things about RW and twink porn while all the time DEWAYNE is the customer of such questionable (age) porn.

So again, if they want to dish it out, they had best be prepared to take it when I give it back.

Not once has anyone been able to show or provide proof of any wrong doing by Robert Wagner. It is a problem, a big on at that for the likes of Dewayne and Rob.

I do not mind 'playing' their game. It reveals tons about them.

As nobody knows who I am, it reveals nothing about me :)

BB said...

for someone who supposedly travels so much, makes one wonder how he'd have time to post on these blogs :)

BB said...

anyone know how i can have changes made to the page about Brent Corrigan on wikipedia?

jim said...

"BB said...
anyone know how i can have changes made to the page about Brent Corrigan on wikipedia?"

Unless it's under lockdown (which it sometimes is) all one has to do is click on one of the "edit" tabs.

I will say this though, if you try to edit Brent's year of birth, not only will you be reverted by the editors faster than you can say boiled aspargus, but your IP address will be banned for life there.

The neutral moderators were brought in to arbitrate, weighed both sides, and have spoken on this issue. The battle was fought fair and square, on the Discussion page (and a fascinating battle it was really...I was thinking about doing a whole Chinchilla post about it someday...until I realized there are very few people as nerdy as me that would likewise find it fascinating), but bottom line...the Underage Denialists got their butts shellacked. Brent was born in 1986. Case closed.

You could probably edit most everything else, but touch his birth age, and you'll likely get banned from Wikipedia for life. Just read the Discussion archives if you don't believe me! Just an FYI.

BB said...

thanks Jim,

I have no intention of changing date of birth. I should not have said I want something changed.

To clarify, I want something added. Sorry for using wrong choice of words.

will g said...

This should be good. I'm going to have to monitor Brent's Wiki page now!

jim said...

I'm sure BB just wants to add something about Brent's 2009 Cybersocker nomination, or perhaps mention his role as "red tank top boy in phone tree" in Milk, or some such!

Rob said...

BB blows, "for someone who supposedly travels so much, makes one wonder how he'd have time to post on these blogs."

Computer access and the internet from anywhere Bio Boi.

Keep deflecting. It's not convincing.