Monday, December 17, 2007

The Motive Is Now Fully Revealed



Well…I was right again.

You remember, way back when lots of people were saying they just did not see a motive for Harlow and Joe to have committed this crime? And since they saw no motive, they MUST be innocent, regardless of the evidence against them? Sigh..I certainly do…I labeled the phenomenon “motive-on-the-brain.”

The truth is, motive is NOT a necessary element to proving a crime. We don’t know exactly why Harlow and Joe killed Kocis? WHO CARES! It doesn’t matter, go with the facts. If all the facts point to Harlow and Joe, then BOOM, they did it. End of story. Stop losing sleep over motive, it is not as all important as you motive-on-the-brain people seem to think it is.

But you know, many people following this case just HAVE to have their clear-cut motive. Drama queens that we are, I guess, we all want to be told a bedtime story, where the protagonists are all transparently driven. And if the facts pointed to someone without an obvious motive? Ehhhh, those pesky facts can just be chalked up to black helicopters or some such.

In the face of all this nonsense I made a prediction, early on when little was known about Harlow and Joe. While I admitted their motive for the crime was rather opaque right now, I predicted that over time it would become clear, as additional facts trickled in.

And like I said above…I WAS RIGHT!

Just like in the movie Fargo, where at the beginning of the movie the motive for Jerry to kidnap his wife is rather opaque…as the movie progressed, the motive became clear.

As of this week, and despite the efforts by people to cover it up…the motive of Harlow and Joe for the murder of Bryan Kocis has now been FULLY REVEALED.

And just like I said, the revelation came gradually. At the time of the arrest, the police gave a “gay porn rivalry” as the motive for the murder. The motive-on-the-brainers back then hooted in derision, calling it the “Velvet Mafia Reloaded.”

I suppose that may have seemed a bit far-fetched back then, initially. After all, what would a bunch of probably hetero police investigators know of the inner workings of the gay porn industry? But then, the affidavit goes public, and we get introduced to Police Informants #1 and #2. And then comes the prelim…and we actually get to see and hear Police Informant #2, Justin Hensley.

Justin Hensley’s testimony at the prelim is devastating. He lays the motive flat out, no weasel words:


“A former roommate of Kerekes and Cuadra, Justin Andrew Hainsley, testified he once heard the two describe Cobra Video — owned by Kocis — as their biggest competitor in the adult film industry. He said the two discussed Lockhart, saying the pair wanted to recruit him to work for their Web site, but Lockhart, who went by the stage name Brent Courigan, was under contract with Kocis’ company.“So the only thing standing in the way was Mr. Kocis,” Hainsley said.”

The motive-on-the-brain Harlowites were understandably distraught at this.

But they did not give up. First, they attacked Justin Hensley, saying he had a “deal” (a claim later proven by me to be false).

Second, they simply went into denial, saying regardless of what Hensley testified under oath to…the motive just did not make sense to them. Like a broken record, they kept repeating this over and over and over and over.

And you know, even I would have to admit that even with Justin Hensley confirming the motive…something seemed missing. Harlow and Joe thought they could get 6-7 figures, OK, well…I too would like to acquire 6-7 figures. I would also like a Malibu beach house, with Lukas Ridgeston as my houseboy. But would I murder someone in cold blood for any of these things? No. I am happy enough as is in my life, such that none of those material things above would EVER motive me to commit such a brutal death penalty offense.

So, for Harlow and Joe to have acted as they did, something else had to be there. Methamphetamine use? Perhaps, but there has been no clear evidence of this (yet). Harlow and Joe were simply psychopaths? No prior crimes of such nature from them, so one would have to assume no to that. So what could the missing puzzle piece be?

Well, about a week ago, that missing piece of the puzzle fell into place: DEBT. Massive debt. Debt WAY beyond whatever income ability they had to pay off, in the months just prior to the murder. The true picture of this staggering debt came in a recent exchange between comments to an Elm post, and a PC post in response to it.

Now, the interesting thing about this final puzzle piece is that it was hidden in plain sight. PC had written of Harlow and Joe’s debt on many different occasions, usually in connection with reporting on the forfeiture proceedings. But it was not until last week that PC had summarized ALL of Harlow and Joe’s debt in one easy to read balance sheet. And not only that – very important details about the nature of that debt was revealed for the very first time. More on that later.

The other reason this debt posting came as such a shock was that we all had been the subject of a massive disinformation campaign by the Harlowites concerning the nature of this debt. The Harlowites had admitted there was close to $1 million in debt, BUT they always explained it away with the spin that they had a lot of money coming in, and the debt was manageable. Harlow and Joe were current on their bills until the arrest, they claimed numerous times, this last Elm post being the latest such incident. This time, however, I decided to call them on this…just like I did when they were spinning “Justin Hensley has a deal.” And what happened was, PC made his debt post in response…and in doing so literally blew that oft-repeated Harlowite talking point clean out of the water.

It turns out, PC had some never revealed info concerning Harlow’s debt, namely, his late payment info:


"Accounts that were late on or before May 2007:
American Honda Finance: 30 days late for March, April & May 2007
DAIMLERCHRYS: 30 days late for February & May 2007
BMW FIN SVC: 30 days late for February, 60 days late for May 2007
Chase 2: 30 days late for April, 60 days late for May 2007
GMAC Mortgage (2nd Mtg): 30 days late for March & May 2007
Chase: 30 days late for May"
As you can see, the Harlowite talking point that “They were not behind in any of their payments before their arrests” turns out to be a bald faced lie.

The Harlowites then tried to save face and construct a fall back position, saying “They were not behind in any of there payments before the murder.” Skoff. Even that was a lie. Fact is, the first 30 day late notices above appear in February, meaning the due dates for those payments were in January…very probably before the murder, or certainly right about the time of it. But once again, new revelations about the nature of the debt makes it clear that Harlow and Joe were in deep insolvency months before the murder, well beyond their ability to pay.

According to credit info provided by PC, Harlow was WAY over limit on most of his credit cards; here is the breakdown on that:

Chase 1: $50,000 limit - $55,071 owed = $5,071 OVER LIMIT
Discover Fin: $4,000 limit - $3626.00 owed = $374.00 available
BofA: $18,000 limit - $40,117.00 owed = $22,117 OVER LIMIT
Chase 2: $100,000 limit - $119,113 owed = $19,113 OVER LIMIT
AMEX: $11,556 owed; AMEX is squishy when it comes to credit limits, however, it looks like they were finally cut off (see info concerning Joe's frantic call to credit card companies below).

Except for a piddling sum left on Discover, all their cards were maxxed out...nay, WELL over the limit. There is only one conclusion you can make from all this…in the MONTHS prior to the murder, Harlow and Joe were running a credit card Ponzi scheme. They were robbing Peter to pay Paul (or, in this case, B of A to pay Chase Manhattan), taking cash advances on one card to make minimum payments on other cards, in addition to whatever other spending whim Joe might have had at the time.

And according to an anonymous informer over on Elm blog (you know, I wasn't planning on using "former escort's" claims here, BUT, I have just received independent confirmation...from a surprising source, I might add...of much of what “former escort” says; so, I am going to be cautiously trustful of what he has to say, for now), Joe had been frantically making phone calls to Harlow’s credit card companies, pleading for these over limit credit extensions. Again, this all occurred MONTHS prior to the murder.

So, “They were not behind in any of there payments before the murder” is also essentially a lie. If you need to borrow more just to make your minimum payments, you are, in reality, NOT making REAL payments on your debt. In fact, you are merely adding to it, making the situation more desperate.

Just to give you all an idea of how bad this debt was, and that there was simply no way they had the income to manage this debt…if we assume $4000/mo was the payments on their two mortgages (a conservative estimate I derived from a mortgage calculator), the total *minimum* payments due for Harlow and Joe in May were:

Cars: $6,627.00
Credit Cards: $17,103.00
Mortgages: $4,000.00

Total = $27,730.00
Now, just for fun, lets see if Harlow could manage this debt on his escort income alone. If we assume Harlow charges $200/hr, that means that to simply keep up with just the *minimum* debt payments in May, Harlow would have to “work” for:

27,730 divided by 200 = 138.65 hours

…over a one month period. Thus for May, Harlow’s legs would have to be in the air on average of approximately 4.5 hours a day, day after day, for 31 consecutive days.

I doubt even the so-called “Studwonder” possesses that kind of endurance. So no, Harlow (nor Joe) were not going to hump their way out of debt. They obviously needed a sudden, massive boost in their "Boybatter" web site operations, which by this time had no doubt begun to lose steam in a VERY crowded online porn market. They needed some razzle-dazzle to attract a new wave of subscribers, and (thanks to Justin Hensley) we know for a fact they saw Brent Corrigan as their savior in this regard.

And there you have it: Debt; massive bone-crushing debt, clearly beyond their income to pay off. This is the missing piece to the motive puzzle.

So you see, Harlow and Joe were not facing a choice between contentment and making 6-7 figures; it was a choice between extra-humiliating bankruptcy and making 6-7 figures.

This is important. Think about what we know of Harlow and Joe’s character (especially Joe’s, who seems to have dominated this relationship). They were “normally rather "flashy" and flamboyant, enjoying exotic vehicles, extravagant dinners, and making contacts for their escort business and pornographic video business.” They “collect expensive Rolex watches as well, and own approx five or six.

And how do you suppose this went over with their peers in the small and insular Virginia Beach/Norfolk gay community? “Harlow and Joseph (aka Trent) are both known to be arrogant assholes around here in Norfolk/VB” one commenter on Towleroad opined. Another wrote: “Knowing both Joe, and Harlow. They are not respectable people… they got caught, and I hope that they pay the price.”

Comments like these shows that their wealth-flaunting arrogance made them somewhat reviled in their own home town. Thus, the humiliation of a bankruptcy would have thus been an especially bitter pill for Harlow and Joe to swallow, as their many enemies in the local gay community would have been THRILLED to have a schadenfreude moment at their expense.

So you see, the real choice before them was not a normal life, or making 6-7 figures…but rather, the UBER public humiliation involved in descending back to their white trash origins…or making 6-7 figures. And knowing what we know of Joe’s unstable personality in particular, the former was NOT an option for him.

Like I said…there’s your motive! Notice that it is not all financial…in fact, I would say the emotional element (i.e., to avoid shame) was probably a greater motivation than the strictly financial greed element, all things considered. Emotionally “arrogant assholes” are always quite desperate to avoid falling off their public pedestals.

Harlow and Joe thus had motive UP THE WAZOO for this crime…thanks to this valuable new debt info; there is simply no denying that fact now.

And you know what? I STILL have more to say on all this! But this post has gone on long enough, so I’ll save it for a “Part II.: A Little Bedtime Story” which will be written with all you motive-on-the-brainers in mind. I will trace the commission of this crime, looking at it from Harlow and Joe’s perspective and motive (which we now know). Thus a speculative narrative; however, every point will be supported by KNOWN FACTS (as opposed to relying on black helicopters and imaginary government conspiracies).

Not only that...but this new debt info is also incredibly useful in explaining much of their bizarre post-murder behavior, which I will trace through as well.

This new debt revelation was TRULY the last missing piece to the motive puzzle. I can see now why Elm was so desperate to change the subject when it came up, and why the Harlowites now threaten legal action against anyone who mentions it.

43 comments:

DeWayne In San Diego said...

Great post Jim!

The full comment by Chris of Va Beach in October was missed by many...

Knowing both Joe, and Harlow. They are not respectable people.

The murder is an issue of money and business though. Not sexuality.

People always feel the need to talk things into more than what it is.

"I want what you have, killing you will make that possible, die." It really is that simple.

Stupid people do stupid things, they got caught, and I hope that they pay the price.


Don't know who Chris is but he said a MOUTHFUL!

Why is it Jim people can understand Passion,Betrayel,Hate,Anger as Motives for murder and yet most murders are about the Benjamins pure and simple greed,,

Read what Chris said again,,,

"I want what you have, killing you will make that possible, die." It really is that simple"

Chris must be a fucking Philosopher!

Anonymous said...

I still can't believe that people who run different activities turns into killers and in the stupidest way..leaving hundreds of evidences.
The only explanation that comes in my mind is that they went just to obtain what they wanted with the force; scarying him menacing him etc. (Gun,Knife) and that someone more powerful knew about their visit and killed him giving them the fault.
Jim, sorry about my grammar..I'm italian, I hope you understand and give your opinion about my explanation.

Anonymous said...

Very well put together Jim. I was waiting for this post to go up. Does anyone have any idea how much money the Boy Batter site actually made? You are right though, the "stud wonder" probably couldn't hump his way out of that debt.

jim said...

"The only explanation that comes in my mind is that they went just to obtain what they wanted with the force; scarying him menacing him etc. (Gun,Knife) and that someone more powerful knew about their visit and killed him giving them the fault."

They went all the way to PA just to threaten Bryan? That seems to me like even a dumber plan than simply driving to PA just to kill him.

In the "just threaten" scenario, notice Harlow and Joe are still foolishly leaving the same trail of clues behind, plus one more...a live Bryan to testify to the threatening.

So that's why I don't buy the "just threaten" theory. That plan does not look any more intelligent than the murder plan. In fact, a lot less, IMO.

jim said...

"Does anyone have any idea how much money the Boy Batter site actually made?"

I'm guessing about 3-4K tops, but if anyone with such insight into the online porn business wants to give a more informed estimate, I'd love to hear it.

Keep in mind too, tho, that my "hump" calculations only took into account their DEBT payments, and not their other expenses (ie, food, clothing, utilities, bandwidth, etc...). And like I said, the $27,000+ figure was only to make the MINIMUM payments on that debt, which would suffice to just barely keep their heads above water.

Anonymous said...

If you're scared because someone threatened you, you don'd "testify to the threatening" you just shut up and do what they want. Maybe they were so sure to obtain this, that they didn't care about leaving clues behind, IMO.

jim said...

As the threatener, you're taking a pretty big chance that your threat victim is going to react so meekly though, arn't you?

And while Bryan Kocis may have been many things, meekness was not one of those character traits he was known for.

Thus, I just can't see it, no.

Geoff Harvard said...

I don't think the loop has been closed here. In the robbery, murder, and arson at the Kocis house, Joe and Harlow apparently carried away as fruits of the crime some computers, cameras, and master tapes, none of which they were able to convert into cash. What did they expect would be the imediate payoff for the crime? Surely it was not the speculative notion that after Kocis were removed from the scene Sean Lockhart would join them in the boybatter video operation and they would automatically make a fortune. That's like pushing on the end of a manila rope and expecting movement on the other end. What was the real inducement for H/J to travel to PA and kill Kocis?

jim said...

I am going to delve much more into their probable financial thinking in my next post, Geoff.

Keep in mind, though, that thanks to Police Informants #1 and #2 (Justin), we know they saw this Brent deal as their way out.

Was it a realistic expectation? Probably not. But then, that does not really matter; what matters is what THEY thought, which again, thanks to PI's #1 and #2, we know.

Geoff Harvard said...

Was there someone who hated Kocis enough or wanted him silenced enough and who had the means to make it happen who could have offered a financial inducement as an imediate payoff to H/J to give them some breathing room in their financial situation? It is probable that S/G don't have any means beyond paying their current bills, so they are eliminated from consideration here. Without venturing into black helicopter territory, is there a plausible unindicted coconspirator who was the moneybags?

Anonymous said...

Are you sure that they knew exactly the character traits of Bryan? And if you think that they were so stupid to buy a knife in a shop with the cameras on the day before the killing you should agree that they could've been enough stupid to be convinced to obtain what they wanted (to join cobra and LSG, Geoff?) threatening him.

Anonymous said...

Sorry I meant (Boybatter work with Cobra and LSG). Isn't this the reason why they couldn't find a deal in Vegas?

jim said...

"Are you sure that they knew exactly the character traits of Bryan?"

That would be pretty high on my list of things I would want to look into, before I went a-threatening someone, yep.

But then, as you point out, they are not the sharpest tools in the shed.

jim said...

Geoff, I can't think of any such person off hand. I'm going to go with my Occam's Razor instincts and say "no" to that one.

jim said...

"Isn't this the reason why they couldn't find a deal in Vegas?"

It had to do with the terms of the settlement agreement LSG and Cobra were about to sign.

I'll go into this in more detail in my next post.

Anonymous said...

Jim,maybe they did look into it, remember the background check on Bryan? Maybe they thought that would yield a clue or two.

jim said...

Good point, anon!

Anonymous said...

Geoff, maybe some powerful "clients" of Bryan that were tired of the chaos around Cobra wanted to get rid of the owner and let the fault fall on someone else, then someone (Robert Wagner?) informed them that 2 guys were going to visit Bryan.

Geoff Harvard said...

Italy, your English usage is improving rapidly. I don't know that Kocis had under the table clients for his "art," although I have read that speculation. The only personal knowledge I have of Robert Wagner is that he is an unappealing porn model, having the same effect in a scene as a pitcher of ice water spilled in the viewer's lap.

PC said...

Jim,

Great post!

I'd say you hit the nail right on the head.

Anonymous said...

Thank you Geoff but I'm afraid it's just a coincidence that in my last post ther are few mistakes.
Dewaine wrote a lot of time about the special clients of Bryan and everybody says that Robert was working for Brian the days before the murder. Don't you think is strange that he didn't know and didn't advised Brian tha MOLIN was Cuadra?

Albert said...

It is a psychological fact, you cannot comprehend an intellect higher than your own. Higher intelligence can be recognized but not comprehended. RW continues to act on the assumptions he draws from his limited intellect. Being bound, gagged and used seems to be more suited to both his personality and sadly limited mentality.
I still have a hard time gathering up any sympathy for him.
Maybe I need to work on that, maybe tomorrow.

Anonymous said...

First, thank you for the excellent post, I used to be one of the "motive on the brainers" Regarding what albert said -r.w.-
I actually feel sorry for him, not until after seeing his blog today.
Serious grief counseling is needed and necessary IMO if this man is to keep his sanity and not let his grief [hate] eat him alive from the inside out.
It was particularly pathetic - that post.
I do not get around to reading Brent Corrigans blog often but I did last night, read about his "life altering" feelings from making a few good steps forward in his life with that movie. Tears of joy, overcome with emotion that he was wanted. It made me smile and anyone would have to be touched by the sincerity. I felt happy for him. He has new friends whom he admires and he got a chance to be in a movie with his peers.
Then I see bb's post this morning and - how mean - to put that [whatever you call it] up on his blog, knowing or maybe hoping for B.C.'s new friends to see it- whatever the motivation it was sickening and depressing.
B.B. GET SOME HELP!

Rob said...

VJ--

You are right about BB's latest post. Because of the one-sided nature of that post, I would point out that Robert Aaron Phelps Wagner was a model in that same Cobra Video studio. By implication and association with Bryan King Pimp Pervert Teen Boy Rapist Kocis that makes RAPW a whore himself, and a still practicing one at that whether vanilla or B/S&M, a paid whore. At least Sean and Grant in their business film which means plenty of screening (Opps! RAPW failed miserably on that one for Boss Kocis, net result being Boss Kocis got knifed) and discernment regarding who they work with.

BB oft whines about Sean being an escort. Prove the escorting BB and quit giving us images from Cobra Video or a few from the old BCO. You jealous you were never that photogenic? Take $50 get a decent haircut and try for RK surgery. May be your business will improve.

Anonymous said...

Rob,
Not long ago bb wrote something on his blog about predicting "where Brent Corrigan will be in 5 years".
He said "drug overdose or suicide" or something like that.
IMO - it will be awful irony but [if he does not get some help] he may have predicted his own future.
BTW Rob - I owe you an apology, awhile back you said something about another blogger that was true and I said something back that turned out to be wrong. Don't need to go into details but I apologize!

BB said...

Rob,

You always scream for proof.

As you often claimed "research pays off".

Apparently not in your case.

Thats what happens when one collects a fat file of (bull) s**t.

Rob said...

VJ--

Thank you, very gracious of you, and no offense taken. I chalk it up to the ways we all interpret the events and personalities involved until other pieces fall into place and improve our perspective.

I appreciate your views regarding this tragic event.

Anonymous said...

Rob says
"It takes a while for the pieces to fall into place"
How true! it has taken many, many months but some pieces are only now falling into place- and how revealing.
bb for instance- I watched his blog with everyone elses, never quite understanding the attacks on dewayne, BC, Grant, etc. but thinking in the back of my mind "he must have some reason/evidence for his accusations/hate"- well almost 8 months later now and I think I have a clear picture of somebody very disturbed who has been making accusations with absolutely nothing to back them up.
I believe a "newcomer" coming into this forum would not understand.
Baseless accusations from a tortured mind.

BB said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
jim said...

In hindsight I probably should not have put bb's last post thru...based solely on the final sentence.

Everything up to the final sentence was fine.

Guys, lets reign in the personal attacks on fellow posters. Lets all "leave off that last sentence."

BB said...

VJ my reason is simple.

I was attacked and bullied by those you name online long before the murder took place.

I gave the CobraKiller the opportunity to end it with an apology. Instead, his actions towards me got worse. His supporters joined in.

Now they deal with the consequences of their own actions.

I will not go away.

They f**ked with the wrong stranger.

BB said...

Jim,

I deleted my previous post and reposted it with the last sentence removed.

This was done out of respect for you and your blog.

jim said...

Thanks! :-)

Anonymous said...

I think that Sean & Grant have nearly pulled off the the perfect crime. Get some dim wits to kill someone you have an uncontrollable loathing for and turn states evidence ASAP after the crime to deflect any suspicion of your setting up of the whole sordid event. I still think that without Grant and Sean's explicit instigation, this crime would not have been committed. But then there is not statue of limitation on murder, so only time will tell............

jim said...

Ah, but see here how we know there was no explicit instigation:

http://silenceofthechinchillas.blogspot.com/2007/11/harlow-apology.html

You don't apologize for something someone instigated you to do.

Anonymous said...

bb,
Thank you for responding and I understand and hear what you said. But can you prove any of these things. It is not because people want dirty details, the posts and the attacks have no merit.
IMO just making accusations and not backing them up with anything [and the posts on Sean] seem to me to be a reflection not on the person being [posted about] attacked, but of the person who does this posting.
Many people have asked before, if you have reason [proof] for this - state it.
Suggestion- a post- Headline- "THE PROOF" and go down the list of accusations and put all this to rest.

Anonymous said...

I do not think the apology was about for the murder, I think the apology was done for the negative results of the murder. After all, Harlow said he almost felt of Sean and Grant as "family" and Sean had wined verbosely about the pressure he had been subjected to, after the crime. I think Grant and Sean were very cleaver in planning for their own skins, in handling the secret recording. After all the they now what what was happening and Harlow and Joe did not........

jim said...

"I do not think the apology was about for the murder, I think the apology was done for the negative results of the murder."

Sounds like a distinction without a difference to me.

"After all, Harlow said he almost felt of Sean and Grant as "family"..."

He did?

"...and Sean had wined verbosely about the pressure he had been subjected to, after the crime."

Which as you notice, would be an entirely inconsistant statement for an "instigator" to make:

"Oh, why oh why did you cause me all this pressure caused by an act I instigated you to do! Whine whine..."

You see? That whining statement is inherently illogical.

Anonymous said...

"...and Sean had whined verbosely about the pressure he had been subjected to, after the crime."

"Which as you notice, would be an entirely inconsistant statement for an "instigator" to make".

Such a statement would not be inconsistent for Sean to make. If you look at Sean's behavior for the past 3 years, whining about all the things that happen to him (even the things he instigated) is his primary behavior. POOR SEAN is what makes his world go around........

jim said...

So why didn't Harlow and Joe correct Brent at this point?

Stop complaining, you TOLD us to to!...they should have said. But they did not, did they?

Instead...it is THEY who apologize to Brent at this point, essentially taking full responsibility.

This is the heart of the The Harlow Apology.

Rob said...

Italy wrote, "[Y]ou think that they were so stupid to buy a knife in a shop with the cameras on the day before the killing you should agree that they could've been enough stupid . . . ," yep, Harlow and Joe were that stupid because of their financial desperation.

Moreover, the inference in the remark is that, if we go along with government black ops/conspiracy, Harlow and Joe look alikes would have to have been recruited. Doubles that would have to look like, talk like, and act like Joe and Harlow. This inference lacks in no basis for its foundation, let alone the illogic of the premise on which it is predicated.

jim said...

No identity speculation posts here, please. People can be free to be who they want to be here.

Unknown said...

What an incredibly outstanding post, Jim!

I too, was one of those "motive" "seekers" and actually still have been, up to, reading this post. Not that I ever needed a "motive" to see clearly the facts, those of what I saw, but this is damning evidence which clearly speaks to motive. I'm sure that this may very well be a key prosecution spotlight on the defendants to wrap around their other presentations of facts.

Nicely done Jim. Just outstanding.