Hello, is anyone here? (TAP TAP TAP) Perhaps some people are, we'll see...
Happy Victory Day 2010! A day not only for a distant reflection on that momentous occasion, exactly one year ago (YES click HERE, reread the whole thing, 12 Updates, and 130 Comments...ah what a day that was!), but also our designated reunion day here, on this no-longer-active blog.
So, what have people been up to, this past...well, not-quite-a-year since last May? Alot of you will actually have to fill me in on some of the overlooked details, as I've been in retirement for so long, but after a cursory perusal of what was the "Kocisphere," it looks to me like these are the highlights:
1) Books on the horizon! PC's book (in collaboration with crime author Andrew E. Stoner) is finished (right?) and in pre-publication (is that the correct term?), and is due out [update: ...between Fall 2010 and Spring 2011].
Meanwhile, Brent Corrigan announced (on his new new new web site) that he'll be writing a "novel" about his adult life (all seven years of it), which "will be available Spring 2010." Which would be before PC's book, however...since his latest blog post indicates that he's currently suffering from a bout of writers block, I think it's fair to say that that Spring projection is now a bit overoptimistic.
Anyways, congratulations to PC on what is now looking to be the more imminent book! I can tell you all that I will be camping out outside my local bookstore the day of it's release, running inside to get my copy ASAP. (Unless there will be a Kindle edition? I'm actually thinking of getting one, and this may be what nudges me to it). I'd like to see Victory Day 2011 be akin to a book club meeting here, with one (or two) books to review!
2) Harlow is still in jail and (according to those close to him) expects due to the miraculous powers of attorney Demetrius Fannick to be set free any day now. A mood apparently shared by a few of his followers as well..see PCs blog for more on this continuing case study in group delusion.
3) Joe is still in jail, apparently entertains none of the above delusions, and if I'm reading the hints left by PC in his book announcement correctly, consented to be interviewed for the book.
You know, I wish I could be excited about this, but my old opinion on this matter still stands. Whatever Joe (or Harlow, for that matter) says now about the murder simply can't be trusted. I mean, they could say, whatever...and there would still be such a cloud of doubt as to render a statement meaningless. Which is truly a pity, as only they know exactly what happened in the Kocis home the night of the murder.
I'll read what Joe has to say, but I wont be able to have any opinion as to whether what he says is true or false.
4) Brent's business partnership with Grant dissolved (say it ain't so!) and so now, Brent is on his 4th (right?) website. But the breakup seems to have been relatively amicable. Grant, to his credit, did not vow eternal vengeance, and did not wage an all out public relations war, complete with lawsuits, to utterly destroy him. Perhaps someone else's past experience taught him that would be a bad idea? Eh, who knows...
5) Browsing DeWayne's new site, it appears by looking at his Twitter feed that much of the old gang (DeWayne, Elm, Will, etc...) are keeping in touch, and are steadfast Twitter friends! I must say, this heartens me to see this! :-)
6) Jason Ridge quit the biz, and deleted his blog and websites. According to this old (now officially removed for lack of sourcing) Wikipedia snippet:
"In 2007, Ridge launched his own production company called Ridgeline Films with veteran porn star [[Rob Romoni]], producing and starring in ''A Rising Star''. He verified on his blog in August 2009 that the company was no more.Looks like all those eeeeevil people and forces in the gay porn industry he was constantly blaming all his problems on finally got the best of him.
-
- After months of hints and direct statements that "Jason Ridge" was going to be on the back burner for awhile or gone from the industry completely, Ridge, whose writings often chronicled his rocky relationship with the industry and its inhabitants, wrote in his blog on October 1, 2009:
-
- "Good bye for now! There are more pressing issues in my life that are more important than this silly lifestyle that I have created known as Jason Ridge."
-
- The blog left a door open for Jason to return some day, but he ends the entry with, "It's time for me to grow up and take my life and responsibilities that have been handed to me and take them seriously." As of mid-October 2009 his blog has been deleted."
7) Meanwhile, other prominent Harlow supporters actually managed to continue on and improve their craft. See this "Episode 1 - Part 1" here. And yes, I would say this is an improvement! As you can see, this is a multi-part, multi-episode extravaganza...so if that 19 minute debut actually whet your appetite for more, you can view the full project to date here.
---
And I guess that ends my nostalgic ramblings for now...comments are open let the Reunion begin!
208 comments:
1 – 200 of 208 Newer› Newest»Oh and I guess I should have added:
8) Memo to self: Do NOT try to friend Andrew Shunk on Facebook
Argh. And Blogger still sucks.
Jim! Hello again and greetings from Germany.
It seems some of us had a productive year. How was yours?
Me? One step closer to world domination. I hope :o)
and
9) I still have not gotten my "lawyer letter."
Happy reunion. Miss reading your work and hope all is well.
So one more time: Hello Jim! Greetings from Berlin!
It seems my first two comments didn't get through. So Blogger still sucks.
Bryn it took a while for the comments to register, for some reason...hum.
Oh well, good to hear from you too! :-)
Nobody who threatened to sue me ever got around to it, and a fictional character from Massachusetts made a fictional move to California.
Hello,
"Quicky" here. Glad to drop in and post. I would love to change my screen name to Quicky but I am not sure how.
I have more of course to say, but am running out the door. But I am happy to be alive, and will vist Boston Market today for the first time in a almost a year to celebrate life in being a free person.
Funny that the unmentionable one has run out of steam, run out of conflicts, just run out of gas lately.
Much more shortly,
Jeff
Greetings Jim! Happy Victory Day 2010! So good to have you back! Have you really been off-line and out of the loop these past ten months? Well, you brought yourself back up to speed pretty quickly I see.
As for item No. 4, I'm not sure how accurate it is to call Brent and Grant's business split "relatively amicable," but I'll say no more about that. Perhaps Grant will drop by and comment. Or not.
I did put out word to all 99 of my Twitter followers reminding them of this reunion. I only remembered myself because DeWayne tweeted your name a couple of weeks ago. Hopefully he and Elm will be drop in and say hello -- Elm was, shall we say, ambivalent about it, but I know he's at least going to be lurking. Hi Elm!
Is moderation on? I assume so, some things never change in the Kocisphere. Guess I'll find out now....
"Funny that the unmentionable one has run out of steam, run out of conflicts, just run out of gas lately."
Not surprised, the whole case was his bread and butter for so long.
Hi Will!
I got moderation on, but it is acting quirky for some reason; posts are not showing up for approval right away...so if something is not posted right away that may be the reason.
The unmentionable one has been too busy scamming investors for his fake porn movie "Brad's Buddies 2" to bother with trying to FREE THE WRONGLY CONVICTED HARLOW CUADRA. He's also been busy salivating over the stars of the TV series "Supernatural," that's his newest pervy obsession.
Hi Jim,
I can't believe it has been a year and I am not sure whether I should be angry or happy with you :)
for stopping the blog when you did, I stopped following too and had to focus on work, BUT, I sure have missed you guys!
Thank you for the update, very interesting, I am happy for pc, Harlows not going anywhere, Brent is doing well and alas Jason Ridge- no comment.
Thank you geoff harvard and Jeff for reminding me about today. :)
"1) Books on the horizon! PC's book (in collaboration with crime author Andrew E. Stoner) is finished (right?) and in pre-publication (is that the correct term?), and is due out this fall."
The book is finished, and as ironic as it may seem (given the date), the contract was signed by all parties today.
We expect the book to hit the shelves this Fall. Probably around September or October.
I just want to thank everyone for an exciting couple of years. It's been interesting. :)
"The unmentionable one has been too busy scamming investors for his fake porn movie "Brad's Buddies 2" to bother with trying to FREE THE WRONGLY CONVICTED HARLOW CUADRA. He's also been busy salivating over the stars of the TV series "Supernatural," that's his newest pervy obsession."
I heard he's also going to his dear departed friend Corey Heim's funeral.
Harlow's younger brother, David Zaldivar, published Harlow's high school fat pics on his MySpace page. Harlow's family nickname is "Belly," which I don't know if it means fat or pretty in Jewish Honduran Spanish.
I've noticed this phenominon before: How the ugly duckling boys in high school tend to become beautiful gay twink swans upon graduation.
Photos of BC when he was 16 show him to rather dorky looking, IMO.
We'll have to see if any of the comments here are repeated breathlessly in an unmentionable place as exclusive breaking news.
Brent's dorkylookingness is the whole point of the Kocis films. Remember, Kocis refused to pay to have his BillyBob teeth straightened and paid him in kind with a Jetta.
Hi all I left a hello earlier today same time I stopped by PC's seems your comment disappeared into the blogger ether!
Some things never change. ;-)
First of all HELLO Jim! I missed you I think we all did. I have wondered at times if you were on Twitter or checking our blogs out.
Hello to VJ and Brynawel as well.
PC,Will,Quicky,Geoff,Elm,Rob almost everyone else I have some contact with.
Will and I had a couple of reminder tweets a couple of weeks ago about this day.
And it got me thinking.
How would the entire Kocis saga have played out if we had Twitter in the mix?
The real time nature of Twitter, You have a true mix of fans,bloggers,pornsters and industry types all interacting.
I am sure we would have had the blogs, yet Twitter would certainly have affected the debate, much as Twitter today is so much apart of Politics and Pop Culture.
Yet for anything in depth we all fall back on a blog or news site.
I KNOW the 140 character limit would have driven me to drink(more)
Where Twitter might have been very interesting was in that initial 45 days when the police were investigating and deciphering the evidence trail.
Twitter may have made their online job harder, certainly the "ip game" would have been more difficult to "play"
That is something I have become bored with I rarely check an ip now a days since I moved from blogger.
I do have a couple of Blogging observations.
I would never have thought my blog would have morphed into a buisness!
and returning to ip's a mystery for me was perhaps solved recently.
From the start of DeWayne in San Diego, I had a regular weekly visitor on my blog with a Vatican City IP address (an official city state ip)
Except for the last month ;-)
"Remember, Kocis refused to pay to have his BillyBob teeth straightened and paid him in kind with a Jetta."
Yeah, he did not get his teeth done until a couple years ago, IIRC...
"From the start of DeWayne in San Diego, I had a regular weekly visitor on my blog with a Vatican City IP address (an official city state ip)
Except for the last month ;-)"
Heh, interesting!
Well look at it this way Jim we were discussing two escorts/murderer's AND the man in the Vatican was running a Prostitution ring.
Professional curiosity?
Dewayne, the Pope didn't die a month ago, so that month ago silence datum doesn't mean much to those of us who don't keep up with popery.
At times these blogs had much of the immediacy of Twitter, such as the 142 comment blogger orgy on here last May.
I've never been much a fan of Twitter. For some reason, it never grabbed me.
But I will say this, oh yeah, early coverage would have been much more "restrained" had it occured on Twitter.
People said stuff on Jason Curious in Feb 2007 I'm sure they NEVER would have said but for anonymity.
Geoff that was nothing we had a couple of posts on Elms that hit close to a 1000 comments, I am not sure Jims record but it was in the hundreds. Comments would get so bad you would have to do a new post just to relive comment PRESSURE!
(every 200 comments a new page would load)
Geoff the head of the Papal Choir I believe was running a male prostitution ring procuring young men for Vatican Fellows.
Same O Same O very easy to overlook
from the Guardian Mar 4th 2010
"The Vatican was today rocked by a sex scandal reaching into Pope Benedict's household after a chorister was sacked for allegedly procuring male prostitutes for a papal gentleman-in-waiting.
Angelo Balducci, a Gentleman of His Holiness, was caught by police on a wiretap allegedly negotiating with Thomas Chinedu Ehiem, a 29-year-old Vatican chorister, over the specific physical details of men he wanted brought to him.
Transcripts in the possession of the Guardian suggest that numerous men may have been procured for Balducci, at least one of whom was studying for the priesthood.
Wasn't there a situation a while back where a Swiss Guards chief, his wife, and a Swiss Guards corporal were found dead in a presumed murder/suicide and there was a suggestion of a homosexual affair according to the corporal's family?
Jim Twitter is something that either "grabs" you or leaves you cold. I signed up in 2008 and ignored it until last years GayVN ruckus between Michael Lucas and Brent Corrigan. I later watched a video of the Castro theater half the audience was starring at their phones!
Haha I blame Phillip Ashton he IM'd me saying DeWayne check Twitter out! I was hooked.
Now I have my first "award" nomination for being a Twitter fiend I haven't decided if I should be flattered or embarrassed!
Mark my webmaster and I have tried to get Brent to feel the Twitter itch and its "hit or miss" depending on his mood.
who knows will we all be so enamored of Twitter a year from now?
Geoff yes I recall that scandal.
Isn't Vatican chorister a stereotypical gay job in Italy?
We're happy to sign with Alyson Books, a division of Here Media, Inc.
Brent doesn't get Twitter. He wants to skip weekends. You have to be willing to send Twitpics from the toilet at 0230 when you get up to piss.
"PC said...
We're happy to sign with Alyson Books, a division of Here Media, Inc."
WOW, that is great news...and ironical, in that it was officially Here Media that fussed about the Harlow/Roecker transcript?
PC, just so we don't have to send $17.99 to cafepress.
"jim said...
WOW, that is great news...and ironical, in that it was officially Here Media that fussed about the Harlow/Roecker transcript?"
It's great news... and ironic in which you detail. All I can do is chuckle.
But PC THAT incident over the transcript may have been the lynchpin, if ANYONE was going to write a book about Joe and Harlow your name would be on the short short list of people to talk to.
"Geoff that was nothing we had a couple of posts on Elms that hit close to a 1000 comments, I am not sure Jims record but it was in the hundreds. Comments would get so bad you would have to do a new post just to relive comment PRESSURE!"
I think there was a situation on your blog where I suggested that another blogger did not actually exist, and you would have thought I had appeared at Kameron Scott's snakehandler church and suggested that Jesus was fake.
" DeWayne In San Diego said...
But PC THAT incident over the transcript may have been the lynchpin, if ANYONE was going to write a book about Joe and Harlow your name would be on the short short list of people to talk to."
I agree DeWayne... and you'd be amazed about the folks that tried.
From MTV to No TV... I knew I wanted to write this book with someone that would share the same passion as I do... tell the true story... not a made-for-TV-story.
I'm happy to say that this is what the book will bring. It's true crime... not the National Enquirer.
I was going to post my congratulations to PC on his blog, but since he's here let me do it here. Congrats, that's very exciting news PC! I didn't even realize Here Media now owns Alyson Books. I think a movie deal with their studio would be the next logical step. Synergy and all that.
Speaking of huge comment threads, remember the Mason Wyler brouhaha? That has to have been a record-holder at DeWayne's old blog, and it was no slouch here either. Ah memories...
"DeWayne In San Diego said...
Geoff that was nothing we had a couple of posts on Elms that hit close to a 1000 comments, I am not sure Jims record but it was in the hundreds."
The official record on post comments here is 381, and the post in question STILL gets hits today...even though this blog is now dormant. Dozens a month! This post has been far and away the most popular, most viewed post on SOTC.
Can anyone guess what post this was?
The answer MAY surprise you! At first...but then when you think about it a sec, it actually makes sense...
Any guesses folks? :-)
Ooops, it looks Will may have guessed the answer, even before I posed the question... :-)
Mason Wyler. This mook still won't get a straight job. That's the thread that won't quit.
Haha, that's what you get for turning moderation off Jim, I stole your thunder! Sorry about that. I really didn't know it was the record holder here though, that's pretty amazing. I figured some thread about a real murder would have trumped a thread about a fake rape.
Yep: The Tawana Brawley of Gay Porn post.
It does make sense...this blog/that post was one of the few places in the gaypornosphere that was not shilling for Mason Wyler. It actually told the TRUTH about how he faked a rape claim, and laid out the hard evidence, in Update after Update.
And so, when people want to research or reaquaint themselves with the facts, to here they come.
The Mason Wyler bit was so much goddamned fun. The blogger accessible info was so transparent. He was so obviously a lying sack of dog shit. Fun, fun, fun.
yes no surprise it was Mason Wyler, and let me tell you something about Mason.
He is the biggest LURKER on the web! You rarely see him comment anywhere but his own blog but he gets around everywhere! If you MENTION Mason Wyler he knows about it!
Like most he must google his name daily.
Hi Mason!
Geoff I remember that post because Kevin Clarke called me from Milan Italy where it was 5 am and I was at dinner AWAY from the house.
;-)
Dewayne, excellent, the lying sack of dogshit lurks here and learns he is a lying sack of dogshit. The fat f-word gets up to piss in Italy and knows I don't believe in his paranoid fantasy.
Where the fuck is Mickeys, and why should we care?
I want to get a good fight going here for old time's sake, but I refuse to take Geoff's bait about you-know-what. Where's BB?
What is this about Micky's Geoff? Did someone mention that? I must have missed it.
Mickys? I miss something?
Kocis and Kerekes are both common Jewish surnames in Hungary and in Pennsylvania.
Well, one last thought on MW...I think MW was lucky the police did not look more closely into the situation; the more and more I look at the facts, the more I'm convinced there was something WAY more sinister going on here, way beyond a publicity stunt.
I think there was an army officer involved, I think there was a disagreement (over nonpayment for services?) which led to a scuffle in Mason's apartment (hence the minor scratches reported later at the hospital), which led to the army officer leaving the scene (without paying?).
But there was no rape. Any sex there was was consensual (perhaps even "contractual").
So, the whole fake rape claim was a blackmail attempt, to coerce payment from this army officer, who seems to have skipped out on the bill.
Attepted extorsion is a rather serious felony in Texas, I imagine; like I said, Mason should consider himself lucky the local police did not investigate this whole matter further.
Extortion and filing a false police report. Wonder when the statute of limitations runs out?
It's bedtime on the east coast. Someone on the west coast had better say something interesting pretty damned quick.
Sitting down to dinner I wonder any unanswered questions left?
My biggie who is Jim?
LOL at least everyone KNOWS Jim is NOT DeWayne!
I KNOW you wont ANSWER that Jim, but is there anything big unanswered questions for you?
jim said...
I've noticed this phenominon before: How the ugly duckling boys in high school tend to become beautiful gay twink swans upon graduation.
Photos of BC when he was 16 show him to rather dorky looking, IMO.
----
I noticed something about Harlow when I saw him in court in PA. He is in my opinion a far more handsome guy than the pictures of him show. With the skinny kid look back on his frame, and none of the built up worked out body, he actually looks stunning, where in many pictures he looks oddly contrived. It is hard to explain (but so sad).
These are the things I found most interesting, body language and eye contact.
I watched The Wilkes-Barre Times Leader reporter Edward Lewis at the trial with his head down rattling away on a laptop and legal pad, not paying much attention to the body language of each person in that court room. Where my reports were all about the body language and eye contact of everyone including that reporter.
So later on I noticed his reporting style had changed quite a bit. And after this reporter had read up on PC and Jim's blogs (during these trial days) - that included my posts, he started to get more dramatic with his reporting style, "Harlow slumped in his chair as..." and these kinds of visual descriptions were later appearing in his (somewhat stale) word for word style of reporting. So it was good that I pushed these experienced guys to come home with a little more bacon from a days work. Dewayne asked me if I thought that this was a possibility before I had mentioned it to anyone. I agreed that I did notice it in a subtle way.
Anyway, it was such an interesting and exciting thing to do, ...to go and visit a high profile trial and report back what I saw, and help make those blogs give the reporters at trial a run for their money.
I will never forget it.
I want to say that I feel a lot of affection for everyone on these blogs except for BB and the crazies who believe in the unmentionable one who attacked me for my disbelief.
Geoff, all due respect, but I believe it was you who attacked first about all that.
Hello Quicky!
TUO just called me an "ignorant cretin" on Twitter, I have to go give him a piece of my mind. brb
Jim is Jim. Duh. :-)
The big unanswered question, ah yes. And I HOPE PC's book answers it (or at least takes a good stab at it).
Why did Harlow and Joe, despite a MOUNTAIN of evidence against them, hold out for so long with claims of innocence?
The RANTS I closed this blog with back in May, in other words.
Was it because:
1) Harlow and Joe were of both so narcissistic as to think they were somehow invinceable?
or
2) Others in "Camp Harlow" influenced Harlow and Joe fight to the bitter end and not to plea, for their own selfish reasons.
While I admit there is certainly evidence to back possibility 1 up, my instinct tells me 2 is more likely. And of course, a certain combo of 1 and 2 are certainly possible as well.
But if 2 was at all a factor...what motivated these Harlowites to interfere as they did? What was their angle?
So, I really would like to know the answer of why a case like this actually dragged on for two years. THAT to me is the Great Unanswered Question.
PC said... From MTV to No TV... I knew I wanted to write this book with someone that would share the same passion as I do... tell the true story... not a made-for-TV-story.
I'm happy to say that this is what the book will bring. It's true crime... not the National Enquirer.
----
I am glad you have a good writing partner who can take your great researching, fact checking and investigative work to an even higher level. I hope that in the book you guys have answered that big unanswered question some of us had at the end of our trial blogging last year.
Your "National Enquirer" comment makes me think perhaps not.
Hi Will, great to see you and a big handful of others.
Rob is one who person I would like to see here. He was very interesting, his awesome intellect mixed with a dash of BS made me really enjoy his take on things last year.
Jim, the big question I was referring to was not your big question, but that other big question. The missing part in the tape transcripts at trial.
Was it because:
1) Harlow and Joe were of both so narcissistic as to think they were somehow invincible?
or
2) Others in "Camp Harlow" influenced Harlow and Joe fight to the bitter end and not to plea, for their own selfish reasons.
I think your right Jim a melding of Narcissism and entitlement (Harlow thought he deserved a GOLD STAR for killing Kocis!)
And the idiot who PAID for Harlows attorney (and still is I bet)
damn I am BLANKING on his name just remember he was wealthy AND dressed like a troll (and walked like one)
Quicky, yeah, thats what I thought you were referring to, the "volumn knob" incident you witnessed.
I'd be very curious what was up with that as well.
jim said...
Jim is Jim. Duh. :-)
The big unanswered question, ah yes. And I HOPE PC's book answers it (or at least takes a good stab at it).
Why did Harlow and Joe, despite a MOUNTAIN of evidence against them, hold out for so long with claims of innocence?
The RANTS I closed this blog with back in May, in other words.
Was it because:
1) Harlow and Joe were of both so narcissistic as to think they were somehow invincible?
or
2) Others in "Camp Harlow" influenced Harlow and Joe fight to the bitter end and not to plea, for their own selfish reasons.
While I admit there is certainly evidence to back possibility 1 up, my instinct tells me 2 is more likely. And of course, a certain combo of 1 and 2 are certainly possible as well.
But if 2 was at all a factor...what motivated these Harlowites to interfere as they did? What was their angle?
So, I really would like to know the answer of why a case like this actually dragged on for two years. THAT to me is the Great Unanswered Question.
----
I think Jim, that it is a combo of both. H/J were hoping for a miracle, because there were those that said divine intervention can and will set you free, all you have to do is believe. And when you are in a really tough jam, believing (in the impossible) is a little easier to do. I am not sure of the "selfish reasons" of others. They may have believed that the sweet stud boy wonder might have done nothing, some are that dumb I'm sure. Harlow it appears is still believing that he might walk right out of this nightmare someday soon.
I have some questions, and I might one day write Harlow and ask him them. But not while he is still in appeals process. I wouldn't want him to say anyhting that could hurt his chances. :)
DeW, it was Mitch Halford:
http://silenceofthechinchillas.blogspot.com/2009/03/trial-musings-10-more-clients-come.html
Seems odd to me that this one rich guy would foot the whole bill...out of "love." Makes me wonder...
yeah Mitch Halford yeah you can believe it he seems a tad "touched" to me!
I thought we all "KNEW" the missing part of the transcript referred to Harlows Senator and NFL client
;-)
DeWayne In San Diego said...
Sitting down to dinner I wonder any unanswered questions left?
My biggie who is Jim?
----
DeWayne, The truth is you know who everyone is, you know who I am, Jim is, and you know things about Sean, H/J that the rest of us can only imagine to be facts.
It was great to catch up with you personally during this coast to coast murder true-life drama. It helped me understand things that did not appear in print, and the backgound players, events, and not commonly known twists to the story.
The Senator client's name we do not know, that is the question I think is not coming in the book, and was on the tapes, and NOT in the transcripts. The reason not in transcripts, is because it could not be proven at the time of trial, and is another can of worms so to speak. But it is a hot topic, and will one day appear.
Quicky, just curious why you say DeWayne knows who Jim is? He says he doesn't.
I also wouldn't be too quick to assume that PC's book won't name the Senator or the NFL player. I believe PC has said he has the client list...
Quicky I honestly do not know who Jim is.
Seriously I have talked to EVERYONE else and Jim is the
International Man of Mystery!
I played that IP game to the hilt trying to ferret out who Jim might be.
In the end I just chose to respect Jim's need for privacy and well
we should all have a bit of mastery in life.
just think of Jim as
Deep Throat
except I am no Woodward I have NOT TALKED to,DM'd or emailed Jim (used to leave him messages as a private comment)
So I dont know who Jim AKA Deep Throat is!
Hey maybe Jim is Dink Flamingo!
;-0
will g said...
Quicky, just curious why you say DeWayne knows who Jim is? He says he doesn't.
I also wouldn't be too quick to assume that PC's book won't name the Senator or the NFL player. I believe PC has said he has the client list...
----
Oh... just because when I spoke with DW, I was blown away by how much he knows. He really has an insight like nobody else including authors of books.
PC's (not) "National Enquirer" comment makes me think he might avoid the scandalous type stuff regardless if he has that info or not. Just because he has perhaps a list does not mean any of it will appear. But knowing PC, and what he has written about people, yes, it makes it somewhat likely I do sort of agree he might.
Quicky thanks yeah I talked to a lot of people and thats just the thing I have a pretty good idea of the role of just about every player in this multi-year drama.
Except Jim ;-)
Funny I was asked by Elm a few months back.
If I learned who Jim was would I say anything to anyone.
The answer was clear then and is now.
its not my place to say..
but I HONESTLY do not know.
okay now that we are done with the Jim speculation.
I think PC may surprise us with his book ;-)
Wait I just received a photo...
I think this may be our man.
Bloggers meet
Chinchilla Jim
;-0
http://twitpic.com/1893mm
I can understand the legal constraints that led to the redacting of the names from the tape transcripts, but I don't think PC is under any such constraints if he has the bona fide "black book." He would just be reporting the documented fact that the names are listed. Think of the priceless publicity for the book that would generate! I say he should go for it.
Honestly, my "identity" would bore you all to tears.
The way I see it, there is no real upside for me "coming out" and some small potential downside (ie, Mason Wyler slashing my tires someday).
So, I'm happy to just keep things as they are.
Plus it's fun to continually stay just one step ahead of that famous and crafty Detective Luchesse!
DeWayne In San Diego said...
Wait I just received a photo...
I think this may be our man.
Bloggers meet
Chinchilla Jim
;-0
http://twitpic.com/1893mm
----
I told you DW was well connected!!!!
will g said... As for item No. 4, I'm not sure how accurate it is to call Brent and Grant's business split "relatively amicable," but I'll say no more about that. Perhaps Grant will drop by and comment. Or not.
----
I gathered that their split was not very amicable, and has left some ill feelings.
I posted Sean's new web address in the comments on the old blog so folks would know where he is now. It was deleted after 24 hours. Grant took it down no doubt.
Well, Brent has said on his blog that he has been afraid for his life at times during the split. And from what I understand, Grant briefly theatened to bring a lawsuit to shut his new site down, making the absurd claim that he owned the Dink Flamingo content Brent was posting. But he backed down from that. It's sadly ironic, but there do seem to be parallels between Grant's behavior and Bryan's.
Huh. Well, whatever the merits of a lawsuit, the PR effect would have been HORRIBLE for everyone. So it was certainly wise to drop it.
We seem to be winding down here Jim, at least I am. Are you really disappearing into the ether after tonight, and are you going to reappear in a year like Brigadoon? I wish you would at least keep posting the occasional comment, on PC's or wherever, in the interim. In any case, I didn't get a chance to say good-bye last time, so if this is it, good-bye until we meet again!
I think the plan is to keep this post open for comments for a couple of weeks, then shut 'er down. Then the Chinchilla will begin it's 350 day annual hybernation period... :-)
OH! That's great. So I will say good night and not good-bye!
We forgot to speculate about who BB is. I hate BB. He made a long term project of shitting on a kid who didn't deserve to be shit on. He is a liar. He is a creep. He has to be someone who lost a ton of money when the Kocis child porn business was exposed. I still hate.
William Wolbrecht, AKA srb412, has a lot of integrity. He is one of the good guys in this story. If someone has something negative to say about him, that is an indicator that the speaker is a creapazoid.
That is one of the strangest things about this saga Geoff,
the thing known as bb,
I cannot believe nobody has ever been able to correctly identify him.
I know I am really behind but,
there is more drama surrounding Brent?
well I correctly identified him but no one wanted to believe it and they took the denials at face value.
I know what I saw in 2007 before he got wise to my ip sleuthing
and the PA authority's know who he was as well.
They simply didnt care about the blog warfare.
Actually I want to know who Bryanwel is ;-) she is Sexy and Mysterious!
Where is Robert Effing Wagner now? He is the likely scenarist of the Kocis underage flix and an excellent candidate to be BB.
Hey Geoff, don't you remember, Jim banned any mention of that name! Just kidding, but seriously, there must be something new we can talk about rather than just rehashing all this old business. Almost a year has gone by! If DeWayne wants to chime in on the Brent/Grant "drama," I know he has a lot to say about it, though I'm not sure how much he wants to say online.
I'm not trying to be the moderator here. Sorry if it sounds llke I am. But the whole subject of Robert Wagner and whether or not he's BB (he's NOT!) gives me agita.
From the beginning, I thought the tale of how Brent and Grant met at Lee Bergeron's house was a nasty story, and I have said so consistently. I don't understand why i and every other working swinging dick on the planet have to get my ass up at 5 a. m. every day and get to work and deal with difficult, unpleasant circumstances, and that lazy mook, Grant Roy, gets to sit on his ass and leech off of little boys. Fuck him.
Funny you should mention that Geoff, I have never really heard the full story of how they met, but curiously, Grant was evasive about it on the stand, as seen in the trial transcript PC posted here. I commented about it in the thread, I thought it was odd.
The way I heard it, Lee was the principal tenant, and Grant was a roommate. They put an ad in a newspaper for a third roommate, and Sean answered it rolling back into SD after being held as a sex slave by Kocis in PA. They charged the 18 y/o $500 a month. Sean is napping in the early evening and wakes up with Grant on top of him plowing him in the ass. That's a nasty story.
Brent and Grant breakup (buisness) no comment.
Honestly either one is fully capable of writing about what happened.
I do want to mention the film producer who initialy interviewed Albert and me the summer of 2007 bagged a VERY surprising interview. So we have that film documentary to look forward to.
(Using iTouch so I am not using Google)
Niggaplease. Why would anyone have interviewed you or Albert in the summer of 2007?
Geoff, you've piqued my curiousity: What exactly do you do that has you getting up at 5am and is of so unpleasant a nature?
Perhaps it's been covered before, but I may have missed it...
Isn't Geoff a teacher?
I'm curious what this "very surprising interview" DeWayne speaks of is, does he mean a new interview with Brent? And what is this documentary? When is it coming out and where will it be shown?
Jim, I teach at an alternative school for high school aged kids who don't fit in anywhere else. The indie movie, "Precious," pretty much sums it up, except that we have a population of white stoner boys as well..
And getting one's ass up at 5 a. m. and going to a shit job is a universal human experience. Reveille, reveille, all hands heave out and trice up.
I will look for the pic (we got proof we were interviewed) I think it was in response to the Rolling Stone & Out articles. Anyway they interviewed Sean and Grant, Brent Everett (just before Albert and I)
Honestly nothing insightful from us I think we were interviewed becasue Albert and DeWayne were so prominent on Brents,Elm,Jim's and PC's Blogs.
What will make this film project unique is the interview with Bryan Kocis and Robert Wagner just before the murder.
And who he interviewed on camera recently.
The film spans everything the Cobra Wars,the underage issue,Brent and Bryan (and Robert definitely a part of the trio) and lo and behold the focus of this documentary gets murdered. So from 2006 to 2010 a fascinating film project.
By a MASTER documentarian.
As for a name not until I get the ok.
I will post a link to the photo (when I find it)
So, Dewayne, this documentary would cover mostly the pre-murder period from Aug 2005 to Jan 2007, when most of us had no idea.
The whole 4 year timeline I gather, I know the initial interview with Bryan and Robert was late summer or early fall 2006.
Bryan was hesitant but in September 2006 the PR war was turning very bad for him with more questions than he cared to answer.
So when approached I think he felt he had no choice,(especially since Brent would be next on the interview list)
As I understand it Robert Wagner was the impetus for the interview taking place (no surprise there)
Of course when Bryan was murdered in Jan 2007 the whole focus of this project would now change.
I believe Brent was interviewed 3X not sure about Grant.
Then all those people on the east coast.
"will g said...
I want to get a good fight going here for old time's sake, but I refuse to take Geoff's bait about you-know-what. Where's BB?"
Actually, it's rather nice to see that not happening this go-around. I just came back today and was rather surprised it hadn't happened. :)
"will g said...
I was going to post my congratulations to PC on his blog, but since he's here let me do it here. Congrats, that's very exciting news PC! I didn't even realize Here Media now owns Alyson Books. I think a movie deal with their studio would be the next logical step. Synergy and all that."
Thanks for the congrats Will!
A movie would certainly make me happy. Our contract already has that covered - though I have no idea whether anything like that is planned. Right now we're just focusing on getting the book out.
I'm quite happy about the huge marketing reach (or potential thereof) though. Here Media owns Out, the Advocate, Here!, gay.com, Alyson Books, etc... certainly doesn't hurt. :)
Um, on that note, before the spammers take over this thread, I'm going to make an attempt to revive it.
So...it seems that Brent's old Grant Roy-era site has received a Grabby nomination. Congratulations to them both! That should be some joint acceptance speech if they win.
That's all I got for now.
Hoo boy, that'll be interesting...
Okay just so it's clear, Jim deleted a spam post, some ad for watches or something. I was NOT referring to Wolbrecht...
"will g said...
Okay just so it's clear, Jim deleted a spam post, some ad for watches or something. I was NOT referring to Wolbrecht..."
And here I thought it was a Kentie post. :)
just wanted pop over and say hello, gotta run the twitterverse is calling.
Hey Elm!
Grr the spammers what they do is check to see if you have active moderation then they let loose (if you do not)
Yes Brents new Site The NEW BrentCorrigan missed the eligibility deadline. He is nominated in a similar category Best PornStar Blogger (something like that)
There was a little pique from Brent that Big Easy was not nominated and Working Hard was.
So I endeavored to find out why.
What I found is in Porn and esp in Porn Award nominations sometime the reasons are not what you might expect.
Now we all know Brent spent some time and effort on Big Easy an expenxsive shoot in New Orleans. Costumes,masks etc!
But this is Porn we are talking about!
Three different Porn Scribes when asked yesterday why Working Hard got the nod over the Flashier Big Easy said
Working Hard has that HOT Double Penetration scene Brents first since Brent E and Chase in 2004!
So much for Porn Ego ;-p
When I was very young, I always believed that everything of which I believed in then, which was of a good and decent nature, would automatically become a part of what life would become for me in its own natural cycle of life, because of that belief and belonging.
I was wrong.
Within the past two years, I have become an angry and vengeful drunk. A fifth of vodka by early evening on many days has made me a hatefully and sometimes publicly expressive person By means that I never communicated to others by before.
To Geoff Harvard said...” William Wolbrecht, AKA srb412, has a lot of integrity. He is one of the good guys in this story. If someone has something negative to say about him, that is an indicator that the speaker is a creapazoid.”
I am not, nor have I ever been Srb412.
Srb412 is a lifelong long friend of mine, but the association ends there. He is Chris’ brother and remains to be younger brother for whatever that is worth to any of you.
I now realize what porn and what Chris was involved in means to me and obviously to you all.
I just have had no ability to connect it all, to me and to him, until now.
So not that I will ever not change anything but:
Every one of you who suggest you know one person over the other - you do not.
Damon Kruezer, Kent Barclay and all of the other names he has gone under for all of these years matter not.
It seems that way but it never ends that way.
Damon Kruezer is nothing more than a peace of shit - that of which none of you can let go of.
He will never go away until he dies. If I could kill him right now I would. But I can't. And wouldn't, even if the opportunity pre-sesented itself.
So go forward, good people of gay life, and leave this scum of life behind you.
Recognizing him will only encourage him.
This was for Chris. I hope it becomes for you as well.
And btw...thank you Dewayne for providing how your privacy policies define you.
Thank you Jim for allowing the honesty to happen.
You know Dewayne, not only would you sell me out under the guise of "PRIVATE" I'll bet you'd do the same to your own mother.
Best regards,
William.
And btw...Dewanye..as long as I'm being the angry drunk.....
Allow me to recall, PUBICILY, when you used us both for your private blogging frustrations as to why your blog didn't work. CHris and I walked you thru those days. Remember?
You want to call me a drunk publicly? Fine. Why not at least try it privately before?
DEWAYNE....I WILL MEET YOU PUBLICLY, AT YOUR CHOICE OF MEETING TO DEFEND YOUR HEARTLESS STAB AT ME BELOW..AND BEFORE I PASTE IT...YOU ARE INDEED THE BIGGEST SCUMBAG I HAVE EVER KNOWN IN MY ENTIRE LIFE. ENTIRE LIFE.
DeWayne In San Diego said...
William I wathced (along with Mark Wilson) the emails from you and Geoff to Damon Kruezer so I am well aware of how YOU sold out Chris's work in the end.
Budd Foxx was anti Damon Kreuzer
You were not
You saved DK's website so he could continue his vendetta.
I have a long memory and never forget.
Geoff I can understand he never believed DK existed.
You on the other hand were guilty of a reprehensible betrayal
of everything Bud Foxx stood for.
You crossed over to the dark side not I
I kept your secret until tonight after all your racist attacks on Will and Elm I am done with you.
TO DEWAYNE.....
IF YOU EVER AGAIN CALL ME PRO-KRUEZER AND SUGGEST TO OTHERS THAT I AND CHRIS WERE NOT ONE AND THEN I WILL SEEK, SEARCH AND FIND YOU OUT AND MAKE YOU THE HEADLINES OF YOUR LOCAL NEWS...
GOT ME?
Before anyone gets too excited...No, I have no liter fluid, an accompliance, nor do I have an instinct or ability to kill.
I'm just really pissed at how people like "Dewayne" and or "THE BOSS" get taken seriously.
How does that really happen?
Dewayne wouldn't know anything unless it was by knee jerk. Seriously.
I am not finished with you Dewayne.
You claim I was NOT one with my Chris?
You prove that buddy.
you have my email and more.
I'm waiting..........
lol....DEWAYNE has now threatened me with an attorney action...
STOOOOOPID him. I have more than he'd ever want to defend.
from Twitter Dewayneinsd
I get my first explicit Death Threat in nearly 3 years, last man who threatened my life is under Federal Indictment http://tiny.cc/871PI less than 5 seconds ago via web
I might add that is Judge Michael Conahan who threatened my life in February 2007 when I was writing about the juvenile Detention centers on another blog.
Hi Jim. Harlow rehired Fannick. Figures. This guy walked in a Fool's Paradise and has never found his way out. I used to believe that Harlow actually thought he had a chance to win over Brent, in his view, with over fawning attention and daring do.
Someone asked a question in one of your blog segments about whether Harlow had given himself false courage with meth or some other drug that would cause his disconnect from reality and turn him into berserk fiend. Harlow certainly had enough time to get high on the trip to Dallas Township. Who knows?
Joe's acceptance of his surroundings does not come as that much of a surprise. He does not have anyone to impress. Joe can pump iron during his rec time and/or brag about past exploits to prison mates who need a fantasy lifeline to make it to the next day.
My opinion is your organization of this material would make the best nonfiction account of the crime and its aftermath. Fair, objective, insightful, provocative and egalitarian.
Thanks for being the mostly unflappable sage of this sordid business.
This is my life, it was Chris' life and after all of this- I hope DEWAYNE will say the same...
Or. at least want to put it to rest, since he doesn't want to talk to me.
anything that dewayane has to blog about is most likely as important to you or to me as to the shit on the bottom of his/or our shoes....
oh look...
so no more links...ok, copy and paste. It's the way I was meant to be,
http://brinkzone.blogspot.com/
Alrighty then. Aren't you glad you kept this thread open Jim?
Okay boys one more time about BB.
BB is the shorthand for BioBoi, short for BiohazardBoi which was a sarcastic nickname that Sean tacked to his nemesis for having tagged him with the moniker Toxic Twink. The original name of choice was BBforTruth. All of these names were smokescreens for Aaron Phelps, the porn name of Robert Wagner which is also a smokescreen.
Wagner used one of the names, BioBoi, on a hookup site. As for the Wagner name, the son of a bitch slipped up in a photograph. He wore a T-shirt with the name of an organization on it. Why mention this? Try as you might for public records under "Robert Wagner" resident of Pennsylvania for his age, etc. nothing returns. The awarding of diplomas (high school) and degrees (college/university) is public. Again, no return. The public record returns a dry hole which should not be the case. So that opens the door to the fascinating question of whether the performer known as Aaron Phelps/Robert Wagner perjured himself on a 2257 form.
Odd still that the son of a bitch in question jumped like a cat on a hot tin roof when the MTV documentary producer hailed him on a NYC street. The quote was "He (Wagner, or whoever the Hell he is) looked like he was going to be shot."
You would be quite correct in assuming that I really don't like Wagner. There is enough to suggest that he was an informal enforcer for Bryan Kocis in life, a misplaced loyalty, because the dead man had no loyalty to anyone in return. So, if that is BS, it errs on the side of truth.
Quicky. Hello. Nice to read that all's well with you. One of the wisest moves was my having a part in sending you to Luzerne County. You brought a touch of humanity to the whole business.
Jim mentioned why this murder case should have dragged out so long--that perhaps certain people had motivators of their own behind stringing Harlow and Joe along. I think that pretty much slams the nail into the 2 x 4.
Then an observation regarding Grant and Sean. A most sordid relationship with Kocis, rife with intimidation brought those two together. A relationship developed that was constantly hit by rough going. Both insisted on an open relationship which is not a commitment but an excuse to play. One part of that relationship began to mature and saw himself as having many facets. The other part was settled into a routine, drank to relieve tension and could become meanspirited if drinking too much. Grew jealous if any guy got too close to Sean despite the open relationship clause. Result: they grew apart. One still wishing to retain control. There was an attempt at a business relationship but the controller wanted to continue to control all things. Briefly, the one to be controlled did not wish to continue to be controlled but in control and went his own way and is doing quite well and continuing to thrive.
Sean has charisma, intelligence; he is capable of reinventing himself as a celebrity. He has viability and will be around for quite awhile.
Hi Brynawel. Great to read your comments again. You still class up the joint.
Hi Dewayne, Geoff, and Will.
I want EVERYONE to know what the delusional DEWAYNE is communicating to me and accusing me of.
This is his email to me.
"FROM DEWAYNE TO ME"
All further contacts will be forwarded to my attorney and Law Enforcement.
I have the email to you during last Marchs live chat with Damon Kreuzer in which I informed you that Mark Wilson had a plan for Kent Barclays domain,(this was in response to your claim that Mark and I were working WITH Kent) I only mentioned this to you because you "Claimed" to be upset with Mark and I and our seeming collusion with Kent.
So I cam clean with you and informed you that we were attempting to sieze control of Kents domain and shut it down.
You immediately contacted Geoff Harrvard AKA Jim Bardon and informed him. He then emailed Kent and informed him that Mark Wilson was attempting to lock him out,
What you and Geoff were not aware Mark Wilson and I were reading the exchange in real time.(Since Mark had web developer access to Kents email system)
Your collusion with Geoff Harvard to rescue Barclays website from being wrested away was recorded.
Whats more everyone KNOWS about it. EVERYONE!
So your protestations of being anti Kreuzer ring VERY HOLLOW with everyone!
You made an EXPLICIT Death Threat just now this has been screencapped and tomorrow I will walk this email and screen-caps across the street to my attorney.
All further communication from you will be ignored.
I suggest you restrain yourself I do have Federal Law Enforcement contacts from the LONG Cobra investigation.
You sir are the one who will be investigated for making an implicit Death Threat against me. In Public.
DeWayne "
For the life of me people, this is just insane. Acusing me of this is like saying I'm Damon Kruezer himself"
William -
As much as I hesitate to get in the middle of this, and at the risk of trying Jim's patience to the breaking point, let me ask you this:
Geoff Harvard made the claim that you and Srb412 are one and the same. You have denied it. You're now saying that Srb is Chris' brother, if I'm following you correctly? Why is Geoff, someone who you and the person calling himself Srb412 have been in contact with, saying otherwise?
Be that as it may, you don't deny that DeWayne confided in you the truth about Mark's plans, do you? Because shortly thereafter, SOMEHOW, Kent knew about it and took action. HOW do you explain that? SOMEONE told him, and it would have to have come from you either directly or indirectly, since it happened immediately after DeWayne told you, and you were the only one who knew.
From the available evidence,you do seem to have "unclean hands" when it comes to that episode. Perhaps your (and/or Srb412's) unexplained hatred for Mark Wilson overrode your feelings about Damon Kruezer?
I have heard conflicting stories about whether it was Srb412 or Geoff who tipped Kent off that night, but there doesn't seem to be any way for you to credibly deny your involvement. I have heard that Kevin Clarke confronted you about it, asked you why you did it, and that you had no answer for him.
It would behoove you to tell the truth about this episode. There is a paper trail.
Hello Rob.
Will--
Hello Will. You are one likeable guy. I am glad that Jim put this up. I have been following your tweets elsewhere. Thank you for those pithy insights.
Well, one thing never changes. The audacity of the ever inventive con man, DK. That asshole is everywhere and nowhere.
That plate of Boston Baked Beans will be biting off more than he can chew in tangling with Mark Wilson. Have at it DK, you will truly come out on the losing side.
"From the available evidence,you do seem to have "unclean hands" when it comes to that episode. "
You motherfuckers are beyond reproach.
I challenge, authorize and further encourage Mark Wilson to PUBLICLY PUBLISH ANY email from me to damon kruezer which links me to having "Unclean hands"
He can't and won't because they simply don't exist.
The only emails kent barclay has ever received from me have been of the fuck you drop dead style which were sent immediately after Chris died and he published the hateful lies and distortions about his death which he did.
AGAIN----MARK WILSON, publish anything you have and bring it to the table. Obviously Mark Wilson is as much a liar as he is a plagiarist.
.....And further
I do sincerely hope that Jim's patience is not being tested here.
This blog has always represented seeking out the truth.
So again...to DeWayne and Mark Wilson:
Present here publicly, or provide linkage here to where you will present these email communications between me and the crazy loon called DK.
Publish them or publicly apologize to me.
You owe everyone one or the other.
What the hell is going on here?
Gee, one year and feelings still are pretty ruffled.
Guys: "Victory Day 2010!" not "Bashing Day 2010!"
Well, I log on today to see if anything new has been posted...
Oy.
Well, the most interesting thing here to me is how even after a year has gone by, people still have difficulty letting go.
Has BB ever made an appearance, ANYWHERE, since the date he said "So long, farewell, auf Wiedersehen, good night?" Yet some people are still obsessed with him.
The Kruezer problem. FWIW, William is right, you can't "destroy" him. I figured this out on my own shortly before I retired. You see, the problem with DK is, he fills a niche. And that niche being, the means by which studio execs in the gay porn industry anonymously slander their rivals.
There are simply too many studio execs out there (ie, Howard of Fabscout) who when pressed will publically denounce DK, but when he wants to trash someone else in the industry, he won't hesitate to feed DK a "tip."
The beauty of the situation is (from Howard's perspective) is the tip in no way needs to be true. DK is totally unconcerned about the truth or falsity of the crap he publishes (in fact, as we all know, most of it is false). DK has no standards, so people like Howard can rest assured whatever he sends in WILL get printed.
And notice something important here: DK is NOT the problem. The problem is the "niche" that he fills.
If Kent Barclay were to be run over by a Boston metro bus tomorrow and killed, this industry "niche" would be quickly filled by some other attention-starved low life with rudimentary web skills. Thus you see, you cannot "destroy" DK. The niche will be filled; nature abhors a vaccuum.
So, this is where William is wrong: Not EVERYONE is unable to let go of "DK." I let go of him pretty much just after I figured all of the above out on my own, and shut down my blogs. And I've been in personal peace and happyness ever since.
Now, that being said...for those of you still in the anti-DK trenches...let me suggest an alternate strategy. Rather than wasting time trying to "destroy" what cannot be destroyed, focus your energies on "harm reduction" instead.
The worst thing about DK IMO is not is his web site, but his occassional forays into "talent management." I think that efforts to warn newcomers into the industry about the dangers of DK ARE time well spent. Continue to get to these newbies (and there are literally dozens coming into the industry every month) BEFORE Kent does, and warn then. Keep them from becoming the next Gavin Braun.
Focus on that, and stop wasting time on futile "destruction" efforts. That's my advice to you all, take it or leave it.
And as to whatever else William and DeW and Geoff and Will are going on about: No comment and no opinion. Obviously some stuff going on this past year I no nothing about, and I can't say I have any desire to catch up on it.
SO sorry about all this Jim. But just briefly:
William, I actually join you in asking Mark Wilson to publish his evidence, if he has it. Let the chips fall where they may. I am only interested in the facts and the truth. Otherwise, I really don't want to continue this on Jim's blog. If you'd like to correspond with me privately, you can use your Twitter account to DM me, or you can ask your friend Srb for my e-mail address.
Jim,
Just wanted to give you a quick update that the book now appears to be released sometime between Fall 2010 and Spring 2011. We'll be doing an official post about it shortly on my blog.
I just got word about this from the publisher yesterday.
Apparently they had to redo the fall 2010 list in order to accommodate the production budget, which means some books that were planned for release later this year will move to the following spring, 2011.
Perhaps we can get it released in March, wouldn't that be a hoot for timing (again).
PC, yes, hopefully a release by Victory Day 2011... THAT would be perfect!
Why in the Hell go ballistic for the likes of that MA bunghole?
He couldn't find a verifiable fact with GPS and the US Geological Survey providing logistical support.
I have interacted with a whole slew of intelligent men and one good woman, Brynawel, through these posts. I like the diversity of the thought processes represented. None of us has to agree with every jot and dot. I have been able to walk in others' moccasins to understand the same information from a different vantage point.
Jim is quite right about one thing; there were operating some attempts at perverting justice which circled the drain fortunately.
Dewayne it is always good to hear from you. Send me a message when you get the chance.
"William Wolbrecht, AKA srb412"
I assumed that the person I corresponded with in April and May of 2009, srb412, was also William Wolbrecht. I have learned that this is not true. I apologize for igniting the above fight. It was unnecessary except that William Wolbrecht and I, who had never had contact, were accused of having conspired to spoil Mark Wilson's plans to undo the unmentionable one.
Jim as usual you are the voice of reason and logic. I blew up last night and have apologized to William.
As for Kruezer I agree he is someone who has been useful in the past to Gay Porn players with an Axe to grind.
Your suggestion overall on how to deal with DK is what Elm,Will and Zach Sires (formely Unzipped Editor) several of us on Twitter have attempted to do.
The strategy seems to be working most of the porn stars now treat DK as a "Phone sperming joke" and I don't think Chris Steele will suggest a model talk to the Kruezer for some cheap publicity in the future.
We can't of course continue to ignore DK's "Talent management" or "Porn Production" hoaxes since they cost real money. A man we all know was bilked out of 11K last summer precisely because he bought the Kreuzer "Story"
So its a process of education and getting pornsters to mock and ridicule the Sperming Troll from Quincy.
Hey Rob glad to see you showed up!
Sorry I forgot to DM you I was away most of the weekend.
Does anyone here still give a rat's ass about Sean Lockhart? If his San Diego transit bus were t-boned at some intersection by a semi and he were killed, would that affect your life in some way? I won't disclose my own feelings. I'm just asking.
"Geoff Harvard said...
Does anyone here still give a rat's ass about Sean Lockhart?"
As part of my general fascination with this murder saga, I'm interested in what he has to say about it in his upcoming book. Stands to reason there'll be some very interesting "behind the scenes" revelations finally coming to light, which only he (and/or Grant) can tell.
Although, I'm frankly a bit disturbed by the fact that he's calling it a "novel." This seems an admission there will be some "artistic license" taken with his story, and I have to wonder...why? As if the pure realism of what he went through isn't fantastic enough??? [scratching head]
Anyhoo, there's been some recent updates on his book project, via Twitter:
"BrentCorrigan FUCK ME! I just uncovered the name of my book! This is so exciting!
11:20 AM Mar 17th"
"BrentCorrigan NO, the title will not be called Fuck Me. I'm not going to say what I am thinking until it can be properly discussed with my publisher. Duh.
11:27 AM Mar 17th"
First,
I wish Brent and PC best of luck with their books but personally I believe that window of opportunity for any interest in either ones book is closed.
I would venture that not many more people that read these blogs would get the books, maybe brents will get more because of his porn fans interest.
Just my opinion,
but it is late for books on this story and maybe even dull now.
VJ said... First,
I wish Brent and PC best of luck with their books but personally I believe that window of opportunity for any interest in either ones book is closed.
I would venture that not many more people that read these blogs would get the books, maybe brents will get more because of his porn fans interest.
Just my opinion,
but it is late for books on this story and maybe even dull now.
--------
I agree, the story is over and the end came. And imo the fumbling duo and their stupidity do not translate into a fascinating story of intrigue, in fact the more details one finds out, the more it lacks intelligence, and reason. It's John Waters' territitory rather than Dominick Dunne's.
And that one question about the Senator does not require a purchase of this book, if the book even answers that question.
The story leaves a bad after taste with us all. There would have to be some real humdingers not yet revealed.
But I do think that all of the PC info gathering and sorting should go to some means of an end, if the blog is locked up then a book makes the most sense as a final resting place for all that info gathered.
And so far as Brent's book, I don't think Brent would be able to write about his taking the stand in PA. He was inside of a vacuum, and could hardly feel anything. So practiced about what he would say, how he would dress and appear, that he could hardly remember much of what he had gone through up on the stand.
I wrote an outline, a type of short movie script with each person's testimony, and body language. I decided not to post it anywhere, and felt Brent would just copy the feel and tone for his own book which appears stuck in writer's block.
I'll shoot my own short film of the three weeks of court room drama, and what went on outside of that court room after I have read more of the transcripts. I'm not in a hurry right now. In fact I am in a different head space now.
Geoff Harvard said... Does anyone here still give a rat's ass about Sean Lockhart? If his San Diego transit bus were t-boned at some intersection by a semi and he were killed, would that affect your life in some way? I won't disclose my own feelings. I'm just asking.
------
In a way I think we would care.
I think that for all of this sad icky story, there has to be some redemption out of it. I mean I would like there to be. Most stories have something redeeming I like to think.
I learned that the porn industry is all smoke and mirrors. These gay porn awards that some refer to, they are all bullshit and mean nothing. Not one thing except to advertise some of the latest videos, and in return for the models appearing for this advertising event, they get a night out and some drinks, and maybe another picture on the internet.
These superstars are not superstars at all regardless of some bloggers of studios calling them so. This has been Sean's biggest problem, trying to bring his career up to a respectable place while hanging onto his old porn name. It is a contradiction he may never figure out. All he seems to have figured out is that 90% of the people he has worked with are scumbags.
They are selling a fantasy, and not a real product. So the end game comes much faster than it normally would even without a poorly planned murder to speed things up.
Sean is the last one standing, against the odds, I would like to think that he can do something good with the infamy he has gained.
DeWayne In San Diego said... We can't of course continue to ignore DK's "Talent management" or "Porn Production" hoaxes since they cost real money. A man we all know was bilked out of 11K last summer precisely because he bought the Kreuzer "Story"
----------
What kind of sucker would invest 12k in DK?
I think that the site and the name can only exist and survive if there is some conflict that people want to know about.
The Loser creates conflict and takes a side, and hopes to create controversy and interest.
Fabricated events that nobody cares about cannot carry a site for long. The big redesign, move to LA, appearances that never happen, brand buyout, etc.
If anyone believes any of that shit than they must be real suckers.
Like Jim said, he exists because there is a vacuum that is filled. This is a rotten dirty business, and there seems to be a place for this kind of slime ball down there at the bottom.
But anyway, if there were checks cashed, or funds sent, then it would be easy to trace back to MA. Scammers who stay put do not generally last too long. They must keep running or they get whacked, it's the nature of the biz.
Nothing lasts forever, not even a cockroach.
"But anyway, if there were checks cashed, or funds sent, then it would be easy to trace back to MA."
It was wired through Western Union, if I'm not mistaken. I believe the FBI has a nice new picture of Kent picking up the funds. The fact that it was done through WU means that he was able to keep up the front with his mark of living in NYC, while picking up the money in Quincy.
I too was dumbfounded that anyone would be foolish enough to send him $11,400. But that's unfortunately what happened, and there is an ongoing investigation being conducted by the FBI and Secret Service.
There were voicemail tapes posted by Dexx Jones on his site where you could listen to Kent at work in this scam, but unfortunately that site has disappeared. Maybe Elm can post them again. In these tapes, Kent tells the victim that he "really cares about him," that his fictitious boyfriend Marc has "misappropriated" the funds, and then requests $1,500 more for his flight to California. The victim had wised up by that point and didn't send him any more money. But somehow Kent and Marc and Wayne were able to move to Silver Lake anyway. And even though the money had been misappropriated, somehow Kent has managed to film his epic movie. He's very resourceful.
Oops, sorry I'm late, did I miss anything?
(besides Sean ratting out his CobraKiller to the feds coz CobraKiller made psesific threats)
Wolbrecht: Want info on Dewayne? let me know, got tons of it :)
And finally, Hi Jim!
Bryan Kocis made about $134,436 per year in income in 2006. Only 2DVD's released that year with the last one selling almost exclusivly thu his web site. I didn't se TILABB on retail shelves until April 2007. You can easily imagine Bryans income was double in 2005 a year of a full release schedule.
Income statement filed by Kocis family attorneys reported on Times Leader
will g said... It was wired through Western Union, if I'm not mistaken. I believe the FBI has a nice new picture of Kent picking up the funds. The fact that it was done through WU means that he was able to keep up the front with his mark of living in NYC, while picking up the money in Quincy.
I too was dumbfounded that anyone would be foolish enough to send him $11,400. But that's unfortunately what happened, and there is an ongoing investigation being conducted by the FBI and Secret Service.
--------
Wowie Will, you really got the lowdown on that one. I had no idea anyone was paying any attention, or that a scam could have happened like that.
I guess it might be time for Jim to unlock the "K On Trial" blog now so we can keep up on the statewide manhunt, and where it all ends, I mean it could end with a self inflicted gunshot wound to the head in a dirty basement.
I like to think about positive outcomes, stay positive anyway.
Quicky are you on Twitter? You should come join all of us "haters" there, it's a good way to keep up with the latest developments with the Luezer. Even Babs, Kent's mother, has an account, she's a riot! Mine is willgold22.
Sounds like Will and Co. have the situation in hand on Twitter!
If there's an arrest tho, and legal papers get generated (which could then be posted) I *might* be tempted to update KB...OT.
We solved this mystery over a year ago. The process servers can go to the address we mentioned in
Greensboro, NC.
Yeah right...
Law enforcement knows exactly where he is Geoff, and it ain't NC.
www.KRUEZERATNIGHT.COM
Registrant:
Kent Barclay
Box 39487
Griffith Station
Los Angeles, California 90039
United States
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: KRUEZERATNIGHT.COM
Created on: 10-Mar-06
Expires on: 10-Mar-11
Last Updated on: 03-Mar-10
Administrative Contact:
Barclay, Kent barckent@gmail.com
Box 39487
Griffith Station
Los Angeles, California 90039
United States
213-280-2805 (BLOCKED or INVALID#)
www.damonkruezer.com
Registrant
Domains by Proxy, Inc.
(480) 624-2599 Phone
(480) 624-2598 Fax
DomainsByProxy.com
15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States
damonkruezer.com@domainsbyproxy.com
Yes that's the PO box for his "new Silver Lake address." All part of the same scam.
Will, this pursuit of the Great White Kruezer is no good. You should take up something healthy like pilates.
With nothing better to do this morning, I decided to finally take a gander at John Roecker's "Svengali's World" website. I noticed that there's also something posted there called How I Learned My Lesson, a documentary about filmmaker John Roeker. In it there's a section about his porn-star series, and there's a passage on Harlow starting at 12:35. He (or more precisely the British actor reading his words) says:
"And then the last person I interviewed would forever change my life."
Newsreel footage, Harlow reads his "poem," then at 14:55:
"I did this episode on Harlow before he even went to court. Shortly after it aired, Harlow was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment without any evidence, and a defense lawyer who had a month-and-a-half to defend his life. When I heard the verdict, something snapped within me. It was a veil of sadness that I would always wear. I was in a state of shock..."
For some reason I also visited the *Gladis* Help Free Harlow Cuadra! MySpace page. Strangely, Roecker is not among Gladis' 133 friends, but they do include:
The Jonas Brothers, Adam Bouska, (co-founder of the NoH8 campaign), Jason Sechrest, and porn stars Jesse Santana and Damien Crosse. And, of course, Damon Kruezer.
I was wondering if anyone was going to actually get to the Roecker part of my post, and actually comment on it!
And no, I hadn't seen that Had I Learned My Lesson bit, but I have to say...
LOL!
Convicted on "no" evidence...you know, you really have to wonder what color the sky is, on the planet these Harlowites think they live on.
And what's particularly hilarious to me...you know what was part of that mountain of "no" evidence? Harlow's interview with John Roecker.
You know, this case has had SO many ironies...but to me, the one that REALLY sticks out is the fact that the PROSECUTION introduced the Roecker video, and used it to convict Harlow.
LOL, it's true! If you recall, the defense strategy changed after the video was made...Joe pled guilty, thus the "Evil Joe Made Me Do It" defense strategy was born.
And in the Roecker video, you see Harlow in prison telling the world about Joe, his love-at-first-sight "soulmate" for life!
When confronted with the video by Melnick, Harlow unhesitatingly stabbed Roecker in the back: “At the time, I didn’t know (Roecker) was recording my voice, our conversations in order to make a documentary...”
http://www.timesleader.com/opinion/columnists/lewis/Truth_trumps__every_word_out__of_killer_Cuadra_EDWARD_LEWIS_OPINION_03-16-2009.html
Aw, NO honor among thieves, I tell ya! :-)
Ah well, flash forward to today. Jason Ridge's career went down the toidy, and Roecker's been relegated to making excreble web videos. Just goes to show the muses of poetic justice have been working overtime this past year!
From Defamer (scroll down):
Six People Whose Quest For Fame Was Worse Than Richard Heene
Hmmm...was this a "Quest for Fame?" Not sure about that...how much mainsteam fame comes with doing gay porn?
They are on record as believing they could make a million bucks doing videos with Brent (not terribly unrealistic, if they were good videos and you made a bunch of them). So, seems to me the lure was more money than fame...those ugly Ed Hardy hats and shirts are expensive, and Ole Blue guzzled lots of gas.
Well nobody in their right mind bought his "I didn't know I was being recorded" line, which doesn't even make sense anyway, because you'd think someone would be MORE candid, not less, if they think the conversation is private.
But I differ a little bit in describing his defense as "evil Joe made me do it," because in his testimony he described himself as an innocent bystander to the murder who didn't do damn thing but run and hide in the car while Joe did the deed. Which of course makes his describing this person who had revealed himself to be a homicidal maniac as his "soul mate" in the documentary even more damning.
And getting back to the Roecker thing...again, the Great Unanswered Question: WHY did so many people appear to go insane, and publically profess a belief that Harlow was innocent?
I so hope that this is an area PC delves into in his book.
That's true, instead of made-me-do-it, Harlow used the term "Stockholm Syndrome" a lot during the trial, which connotes more of a made-me-go-along-with-it sort of thing. Which is exactly what he tried to portray his involvement as in court.
Oh BTW Jim, the Times-Leader link you posted isn't working for me, I'm getting "page not found."
Yeah it got cut off, try this.
I dunno, the Stockholm Syndrome thing doesn't jibe with his testimony either, unless he's using it to describe what happened after the murder when he was on the run with Joe. Because up until the time Joe burst into the house, according to him, he didn't know anything nefarious was afoot, he just thought he was going to "audition" for Kocis and leave, right?
It's like "I didn't do it or even know Joe planned to do it, but if I did, it's because I had Stockholm Syndrome."
Honestly, I think Harlow was just winging it it, up there on the stand, most of the time. Much of what he said at one point would contradict what he would say minutes before or after...
Why did he take the stand? You know, EVERY lawyer he had, court appointed and private, MUST have told him it was a horrible idea...but he did it anyways. Why?
Was this horrible idea purely Harlow's? Or did some non-lawyer third party plant the seed in his mind that taking the stand in his own defense was a peachy idea?
This is what I want answers to.
Harlow Cuadra
Posted by Jacob Livengood, Thursday, January 28, 2010 3:29pm
my piece for the group show
"The Devil Made Me Do it" at the WWA Gallery Feb 12th
Stop me before I Google again! Lookie what I found, I've never seen this before. It's all the wit and wisdom of Damon Kruezer on the murder, archived in one neat package! You're welcome.
Bicoastal Kocis Cuadra Investigations
Hmmm... interesting artistic interpretation there...
Geoff Harvard says it best about the execrable and incredibly evil queen Will G - who is so good at throwing mud and accusations around, and so bad about telling us exactly why any of this matters to Will G personally. What IS your agenda, Will G, and why are you such a self-righteous, accusatory but cowardly prick?
-- Damon Kruezer, 3/21/09, on his DEFUNCT blog FREE THE WRONGLY CONVICETD HARLOW CUADRA
Yeah...kind of a shame that blog ceased updating...I even enjoyed commenting on it:
"jim said...
"It is really disturbing to me the amount of satisfaction some people have taken in a young Gay man being condemned to spend his entire life in prison on very shaky grounds."
Oh now that's just absurd. Who could possibly be taking satisfaction in all this? No one I'm aware of..."
Oh now there you go, censoring his response, in your typical biased fashion:
You are speaking ironically with a soupcon of derision. No doubt you think you're clever but it is a young man's life we are talking about here, not personality politics.
BTW interesting question...has any blog, other than this one and PC's, made mention of the one-year anniversary on March 12?
Jason Curious? No. Gay Porn Times? No. Just One Hot Minute? No. DeWayne? No. The Multicolored Idiot? Even him, NO!
Even Matt Fondel and his ficticious white Bitchless bloggers overlooked the holiday (which is frankly a bit surprising): http://www.tempcity.com/bitchless/index.php?act=home
I would have thought at least a few more people would have either been celebrating or mourning the date, depending on the side they took, but interestingly...no.
"jim said...
Honestly, I think Harlow was just winging it it, up there on the stand, most of the time. Much of what he said at one point would contradict what he would say minutes before or after..."
You should read his entire transcript... it's even worse than what's been reported (for now). :)
I ran across this little tidbit from Harlow's testimony in this article that I don't remember hearing before -- turns out Joe punched Harlow in the nose before killing Kocis:
Cuadra testified Kerekes burst through the door, throwing haymakers. First, he punched Kocis in the face. Then, he took a swing at Cuadra, clocking him in the nose before grabbing Kochis [sic] and “punching the hell” out of him.
Jim the omission of a story on the 12th was my fault I have been working on more than my own blog I contribute to J1HM and GayPornGossip.
The main reason I guess My main PC went wonky on the 7th of March and I had the fun of doing a Windows reinstall and then restoring backups.
I do think Mark W posted something a month ago about ongoing appeal KRAP (sorry just my feelings about that)
I notice he had a story on the ongoing civil suit by the Kocis family at the end of the week(which seems a waste of time H & J were broke before the arrest)
Its weird I was thinking the other day the trial conviction date (March 12) does not hold the resonance with me of arrest day in May 2007.
On that day I finally breathed a sigh of relief that two killers were locked up.
To my mind a trial and the legal proceedings to come were just a plodding legal process.
When you have made your mind up that someone is guilty (Harlows "confessional" call to Sean was all I EVER needed) the idea they are running around free for nearly 4 months is (and was) highly disturbing.
So for me Arrest day is the big event not Victory day. By the time March 12th 2009 rolled around it was like the an anti-climatic letdown.
I do have to mention something about my belief this was an open and shut case and yet we still have some strange birds out there who think otherwise.
Will discovered this MIND-BLOWING statement from John Roaker
"I did this episode on Harlow before he even went to court. Shortly after it aired, Harlow was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment without any evidence,!!!!
and a defense lawyer who had a month-and-a-half to defend his life. When I heard the verdict, something snapped within me. It was a veil of sadness that I would always wear. I was in a state of shock..."
That is just shocking to me!
I think PC can back me on this one conversation we had about Blacks Beach transcripts and he said they don't need em.
At first I was argumentative (we frequently were in phone calls LOL)
Then I realized placing myself on that jury with just 2 pieces of evidence I would have been all for conviction.
1.Harlows phone call to Sean on the 25th 2007 (The confession)
2.Placing Harlow and Joe at the Kocis home on 24January.
The circumstantial evidence despite the deniers was from the beginning open and shut.
It was so close to the law textbook example read to us jurors on the only murder trial I was directly involved in.
"Place the perps at the scene and find a dead body! Enuff said GUILTY AS CHARGED!"
Okay I am paraphrasing I think the judge spent 20 minutes reading his examples of direct vs circumstantial evidence. But that is how our Jury foreman summed up! ;-)
The Blacks beach exercise now can be seen for what it really was.
An attempt by law enforcement to detect if their was a wider conspiracy. The tapes were more about Sean and Grants exoneration and just watching Joe and Harlow...
Place the Cherry on the evidence Banana Split!
"I think PC can back me on this one conversation we had about Blacks Beach transcripts and he said they don't need em."
Damn DeWayne... you're not supposed to let anyone know that we would actually agree on anything. :)
"The Blacks beach exercise now can be seen for what it really was.
An attempt by law enforcement to detect if their was a wider conspiracy. The tapes were more about Sean and Grants exoneration and just watching Joe and Harlow...
Place the Cherry on the evidence Banana Split!"
Yeah thats always been my take on it too...it certainly has been the practical effect of those tapes, in fact.
Jim writes, "Was this horrible idea purely Harlow's? Or did some non-lawyer third party plant the seed in his mind that taking the stand in his own defense was a peachy idea?"
I believe these two questions get to the heart of the matter to borrow from the British novelist Graham Greene. Harlow was never silent from the time of his arrest through the time of his conviction. His words were fed to us by a variety of persons, including that Martin woman. And, that Martin woman provides our transition to non-lawyer third parties planting the seeds in his mind that he take the stand against his lawyers' best advice.
For this latter stance I can think of a handful of persons with the chutzpah to suggest it as well as the lack of conscience and ethical center it would take to pretty much help Harlow into his present predictament of his own making.
Martin, despite protestations otherwise at the time, had her own financial and legal reasons for shining the light on the witness box for defendant Harlow. Another, keep raising the spectre of a show trial. And, still another, wanted Harlow to testify because he was certain to implicate Grant and Sean with his words.
All this draconian crap circled the drain when Harlow's words became the means for shoving himself into a lifer's prison cell. What a wonderful bunch of confederates that anyone with a sense of self-preservation would distance himself. Serendipity found Harlow believing his own PR.
Nice summation Rob! Amazing how we all seem to be in agreement now. What a change from say June 2007! ;-p Me thinks we want to see this post over 200 as well!
Jim writes, "It is really disturbing to me the amount of satisfaction some people have taken in a young Gay man being condemned to spend his entire life in prison on very shaky grounds."
Oh now that's just absurd. Who could possibly be taking satisfaction in all this? No one I'm aware of..."
Your second paragraph is of interest here. This kind of reasoning spewed forth on a regular basis by two persons in particular, to the point of sounding like a neatly rehearsed mantra which promised much and delivered little at the time of the trial which in that line of thinking was supposed to answer to Sean and Grant's culpability. So, you are quite right. The prosecution and police were looking for either vindication of Sean and Grant or confirmation of their hand in Kocis' murder. Sean and Grant passed that sniff test in spades. What Harlow and Joe got was the rope that hanged themselves.
I am not part of the cheerleading squad. A person more than strongly suggested that Sean and Grant were to be arrested on setting foot in Luzerne County, PA. Two of us were told that piece of blather. Hence, bottom line was and is credibility. There has always been an agenda in certain quarters, and I do not refer to the author of this blog. Jim is a true objective chronicler. Two identities come back nil and that is something that I trust Sean will address in his book, for after all his book will be the account of a principle in all this, and it is Sean who was to be one of the intended victims in a twofold scam that was at cross purposes.
"DeWayneinSD said...
Me thinks we want to see this post over 200 as well!"
I'll second that... here's post 197. :)
Interestingly, THIS is the blog's 200th post.
I think your count is different than the one we're getting Jim, maybe because of the deleted spam? According to the count I'm seeing PC was right, and this is now the 199th post.
So...Hi BB! Didn't mean to ignore you earlier, hope you're doing well. Why don't you come back and tell us all about Sean ratting out Grant to the Feds? No fair dropping that little bombshell with no follow-up.
If BB comes back, maybe we can shoot for 300!
Oh hell, I might as well just go ahead and make it 200. Yay!
Just wanted to add that we all know how devastatingly accurate all of BB's predictions on the fate of Sean and Grant have turned out to be. That's why I'm so intrigued.
Post a Comment